Information on use of numerical occurrence constraints in W3C XML Schema

Thought I would pass this on in case there are Xerces users who haven't seen this request for info from the XML Schema WG. Thx, Lisa. - Forwarded by Lisa Martin/Toronto/IBM on 12/19/2002 02:28 PM -

RE: feature / enhancement request for schema validation

You need to include xercesImpl.jar and xmlParserAPIs.jar in your CLASSPATH. Did you do that? Lisa. "Naomi Dushay"

Release plans

I've checked a couple of proposals for upcoming releases into CVS, and have appended them here for convenience. Comments welcome. Lisa. (See attached file: Xerces2.0.2-REL_PLAN.html) (See attached file: Xerces2.1-REL_PLAN.html)Title: Xerces-2 Schema beta Xerces 2.0.2 Release Plan F

Re: Schema Question - parser behavior w.r.t schemaLocation attribute

Hello, As Sandy indicates, the XML Schema REC specifies that assessment outcome, validation errors, etc., are to be recorded in the post-schema-validation infoset.It is true that if a processor attempts to assess a document for which there is no schema specified, then generally speaking, it is

Re: xerces 1.4.1 -> No support for anyType?

Hi there, A bug was opened for this recently, and Sandy Gao is working on a fix. We hope to put out a bug fix release later next week. Lisa. "Roger L. Costello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 07/13/2001 09:18:44 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: xerces 1.4.1

Re: Validation problem with groups

The fix for this problem is now in CVS. Lisa. -- Forwarded by Lisa Martin/Toronto/IBM on 06/30/2001 05:19 PM --- Lisa Martin 06/27/2001 09:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: From: Lisa Martin/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Validation problem wit

Re: Validation problem with groups

Hi Graham, I'll look at this one later today. Lisa. Graham Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/26/2001 10:09:20 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Validation problem with groups HI, I believe there is a problem when validating against a schema, and that s

Re: Yet more validation errors

Hi Graham, You're right - the size of the schema definitely contributed to the array out of bounds problem... And, we do understand that we have usability problems for schema errors. Although we can't easily fix the problem of emitting schema errors using xml doc line numbers, we'll try to clean u

Re: Yet more validation errors

I've checked in a fix for the *validation* errors that occurred for " _test4.xml" (I tested it against a schema that was modified as per my previous note, and Henry Zongaro's mail). Lisa - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT

Re: Yet more validation errors

Hi there, In addition to the model group errors Henry has mentioned, the following schema errors are detected: [Error] test4.xml:17:211: Schema error: ComplexType 'OrderingParams_r': cos-ct-extends.1.4.2.2.2.1: The content type of the base type ParameterResourceForcedComment and derived type Orde

Re: Yet more validation errors

Hi Graham, Sandy Gao put down a fix for the exception, and I checked in a fix for a few of the errors the parser shouldn't be detecting. You should see these fixes if you extract from CVS - they will also be in the 1.4.1 build we hope to get out later today. There are still schema errors being

Re: [README] Xerces-J: New properties added.

Hi there, I've just changed the names of the 2 new schema properties as per Andy's suggestion. So they are now: http://apache.org/xml/properties/schema/external-schemaLocation http://apache.org/xml/properties/schema/external-noNamespaceSchemaLocation Lisa. Andy Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 0

Re: Circular definition for group problem.

I'll investigate. Lisa. Etienne Roy/Watson/[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 06/15/2001 03:34:20 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: Circular definition for group problem. Hi all, I have very weird behaviour of Xerces-J today, i'm wondering if anyone had enounter

xerces 1.4.1

Hi folks, Over the last few weeks, a number of bug fixes have been made in CVS, primarily (but not exclusively) on Schema support. I'd like to propose that we build/post a release next Friday, June 22, so that we can make these fixes available. Thx, Lisa. ---

Re: Post Schema Validation Infoset

Hi there, We don't currently have a target date for supporting an interface to the PSVI.We want to look at the work the DOM/Schema working groups are doing on a PSVI API, and assess what other parsers provide as well. In any case, this support won't be in the next release (which will contain bu

RE: Validation error (restriction)

Hi, The problem below is interesting.A few of us were discussing this, and we're not sure what the spec intended. There are some interesting variations such as : - the anonymous type for the attribute in the base is the same as the anonymous type for the attribute in the restriction,

Re: Validation error

Hi, The reason we emit the error is as follows - - for derivation by extension, the set of attributes for a complexType is obtained by doing a union of the attribute declarations in the base and those specified as children in the extension (loosely speaking - I'm paraphrasing somewha

xerces 1.4 build - status update

Hi there, Just to let everyone know that we're tagging the source for the 1.4 release as this note goes out.We'll be starting the builds shortly, but we won't actually upload the new release to apache until Tues. May 22, however, as it's a long week-end here in Canada. Thx, Lisa. ---

Xerces release 1.4 scheduled for next week

Our target date for the next xerces release is next week. I'd like to propose that we do the build (and post it) next Friday the 18th (so, we'll pick up any changes made by end of day Thurs, May 17). That gives us a few more days to get our remaining changes in... Thx, Lisa. ---

Schema namespace URI changes

In case any of you decide to check code out of cvs and build a new parser... Lisa. -- Forwarded by Lisa Martin/Toronto/IBM on 05/08/2001 05:48 PM --- Lisa Martin 05/08/2001 05:21 PM To: xerces-j-dev@xml.apache.org cc: From: Lisa Martin/Toronto/[EMAI

Xerces 1.4 release plan

Hi there, It has just occurred to me that we've not discussed the next release plan on this mail list at all. In any case, the tentative plan for xerces 1.4 can be found in cvs in xml-xerces/java/RELEASE-PLAN-1.4.I've attached the current version below. Pls see the file in cvs for latest in

Re: 1.3.1 w/ Xalan 2.0.0 Breaks XPath

Hi Scott, If it helps, the xerces-j team now posts it's release plans in CVS (see xml-xerces/java/RELEASE-PLAN-1.x).The 1.3.1 release plan was put in place a month or 2 ago (and, we actually published the build on the planned date :-)), and we're working on a 1.4 release plan now (date TBD).

1.3.1 release plan

The xerces committers will be voting on the 1.3.1 release plan fairly soon (probably in the next day or 2). I've attached the proposal below (it can be found in cvs as well). If anyone wants to volunteer any other work for this release, pls let us know ASAP. Thx, Lisa. (See attached file: RELE

RE: problem validating schema with Xerces 1.3.0

O.K. - that's the right zip. As a test, could you try validating "personal-schema.xml" (which we know validates correctly with xerces 1.3.0), just to ensure CLASSPATH is correct, etc.? Thx, Lisa. "Aleksandar Milanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/20/2001 06:11:00 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROT

Re: problem validating schema with Xerces 1.3.0

Hi there, From the messages you're getting, I would guess that you might be using an older parser (prior to 1.3.0). Which file did you download from the web site to get 1.3.0? Thx, Lisa. "Aleksandar Milanovic" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/20/2001 05:20:11 PM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:

Re: anyType supported for simpleType?

O.K. - when I started thinking about this a little more, it didn't make sense. I believe xerces is correct in not allowing the ur-type as a base in a simple type definition. I found the following in Section 3.13 of the Structures spec: "The simple ur-type definition must not be named as the base

Re: anyType supported for simpleType?

Hi Holger, I believe this is a bug. I added support for "anyType" as a valid base for complexTypes in 1.3.0 when I made the CR changes (it actually wasn't permitted as a base in 1.2.3).It looks like we need to fix up simpleType handling (and possibly other areas) as well. I'll look into it. L

Re: Call for Xerces 1.3.1 Release Plan

Hi there, I just realized that some mail I attempted to post re: future work for xerces 1 earlier this week bounced back - sigh. In any case, I would like to see us put together a rollout for remaining schema support, among other things (this will probably need to be done across a few xerces rele

Re: SV: support for ?

Hi there, I'll let Andy respond about "unique". With respect to Peter's example, however, I do get validation errors when I run it thru the parser (1.3.0). I used SAXCount to try this out: java sax.SAXCount -v first.xml The validation error I got was: [Error] first.xml:6:14: The content o

Re: xmL Schema : can a complexType element contain other complextype elements ??

Hi there, Are you asking whether you can define a complexType which contains elements from another complexType? If so, you can use type derivation to accomplish this. If this isn't your question, could you clarify? Thx, Lisa. anand awasthi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 02/06/2001 03:53:57 PM Please r