Dave Brosius"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/30/2005 11:37 PM
Please respond to
xerces-j-user
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
Re: [OT] PCDATA Schema in
complexTypes
Thanks!
Does this mean that lets say phone number is a pattern based
this
definable?
- Original Message -
From: Sandy Gao
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:51 PM
Subject: Re: [OT] PCDATA Schema in complexTypes
Complex type with simple content is what you need. You can get one by
extending a simple type. For your example, assume you h
]
"Dave Brosius"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
03/30/2005 09:42 PM
Please respond to
xerces-j-user
To
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc
Subject
[OT] PCDATA Schema in complexTypes
Sorry for the off topic-ness, couldn't think
where else to ask this.
With a schema definition
Sorry for the off topic-ness, couldn't think where
else to ask this.
With a schema definition for a complexType, can you
define the simpleType part of it?
It really seems silly when the content is mixed,
but if a complexType is only complex because it has attributes
i could see wanting to
