> ... I have problem with "not_allowed_element".
You are right about the "not_allowed_element" case. I just fixed it in CVS
(which means it'll be in the next release).
> Now back to the problem with derivation by restriction and Element.
> I am not so fimilar with W3C specs and my english i
o:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 8. Juli 2004 17:16
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: Problem with derivation by restriction with Element
The position of W3C is the position of Xerces, unless Xerces has a bug. :-)
Carefully following the constraints in section 3.9.6 of the
The position of W3C is the position of Xerces, unless Xerces has a bug. :-)
Carefully following the constraints in section 3.9.6 of the schema spec
part 1 [1], I believe your example is valid. Note that the sequence around
is pointless.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#cos-particle-rest
Hallo,
Waht is the position, point of view of W3C with derivation by restriction of
Element? The situation is:
I have an schema, that i want to restrict. At one place schema is open and has
an Element where Element with maxOccur="unbounded" is defined. I want to
define two Elements ("foo" and
