RE: xerces and JAXP disagree

2001-03-13 Thread Steve Buroff
That explains it all. Thanks very much. Steve -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xerces and JAXP disagree Hi Steve and Ian, One should keep in mind that Xerces 1.3.0 was still

RE: xerces and JAXP disagree

2001-03-13 Thread Steve Buroff
Great - so that means it should be fixed in the next binary release. Thanks much. Steve -Original Message- From: Elena Litani [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 11:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: xerces and JAXP disagree > Steve Buroff wrote: >

Re: xerces and JAXP disagree

2001-03-13 Thread neilg
n 03/13/2001 10:00:43 AM Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: xercesUserList <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: "Buroff, Steven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: xerces and JAXP disagree On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Steve Buroff wrote: > In xerces 1.3.0, the class > javax.

Re: xerces and JAXP disagree

2001-03-13 Thread Elena Litani
> Steve Buroff wrote: > > In xerces 1.3.0, the class javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory > has a method setIgnoreElementContentWhitespace(boolean). > > In JAXP 1.1, the same class has the method > setIgnoringElementContentWhitespace(boolean). Note: "ignoring" instead > of "ignore". Shouldn

RE: xerces and JAXP disagree

2001-03-13 Thread Steve Buroff
Ok - thanks. Hope xerces fixes it soon. Otherwise, I'll have code around that will break whenever they eventually do. Steve -Original Message- From: Ian Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2001 10:01 AM To: xercesUserList Cc: Buroff, Steven Subject: Re: xerce

Re: xerces and JAXP disagree

2001-03-13 Thread Ian Roberts
On Tue, 13 Mar 2001, Steve Buroff wrote: > In xerces 1.3.0, the class > javax.xml.parsers.DocumentBuilderFactory > has a method setIgnoreElementContentWhitespace(boolean). > > In JAXP 1.1, the same class has the method > setIgnoringElementContentWhitespace(boolean). Note: > "ignoring" instead > o