Hi,
We're using xerces 2.1.0 in a multi-threaded application.
Bascally we get a lot of xml files from a certain location, validate them
against a schema, transform them using xslt and then process those files.
When running with multiple threads however, the validation sometimes fails
with the fol
> > > a) the full path to the node that cause the error
> >
> > You can easily do it by yourself. We don't want other users who don't
> > want such list to suffer from the performance impact of computing it.
You mean by wrapping the handler?
> How about having a feature, false by default, to swit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > a) the full path to the node that cause the error
>
> You can easily do it by yourself. We don't want other users who don't want
> such list to suffer from the performance impact of computing it.
How about having a feature, false by default, to switch this on?
This
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>cc:
Subject: validation er
when using latest xerces2 (CVS) I get two error handler calls for a single
failed constraint. Can someone please explain if this was indended? I don't
see a good reason for that.
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException:
cvc-minInclusive-valid:
Value '2' is not facet-valid with respect to minInclusive '50
Hello all. I'm having a problem that I need some help with. I have a
Schema that validates without errors using XML Spy 4 beta 2. I've also
validated it using the W3C's web based validator without errors. But when I
try to validate an XML instance against the Schema using Xerces-J v1.4.2,
Xerce
pls let us know.
Lisa.
Graham Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/25/2001 09:59:34 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Yet more validation errors
Neil, Henry, Lisa
Firstly thanks for the info and feedback - hope you don't mind a communal
answe
Neil, Henry, Lisa
Firstly thanks for the info and feedback - hope you don't mind a communal
answer.
I'd sort of worked out that it parsed the whole schema - but I was unsure
whether the parser would issue errors for those items not used by a document.
This (false) notion was based on the fact
I've checked in a fix for the *validation* errors that occurred for "
_test4.xml" (I tested it against a schema that was modified as per my
previous note, and Henry Zongaro's mail).
Lisa
-
To unsubsc
extended
types include attribute groups which also contain PhysicalResourceAttribs.
For example, ConsumableResource contains ConsumableAttribs, which contains
PhysicalResource Attribs.
Now, in addition to the schema errors, there are also some validation
errors. These might actually be p
416) 448-6044
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xmlschema-1-20010502/#declare-namedModelGroup
Lisa Martin/Toronto/[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 2001/06/22 03:16:00 PM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: Yet more validatio
rrors being detected and we believe they are all
valid errors to emit. We'll post additional info about them in follow-up
mail.
Lisa.
Graham Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/22/2001 11:46:28 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Yet more validati
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 06/22/2001 11:46:28 AM
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Yet more validation errors
I've just built new jar files from the CVS (22/06/2001 16:20) which is
producing a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for the simple
I've just built new jar files from the CVS (22/06/2001 16:20) which is
producing a java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException for the simple test:
java sax.SAX2Count -v _test4.xml
(There are also other errors which I'd appreciate some feedback on)
I've zip and attached the schema and test
14 matches
Mail list logo
