Am 26.06.2010 um 06:40 schrieb Venkatesan. S.K. (TNQ):
Undefined control sequence.
l.94 \newXeTeXintercharclass
Just update! (With tlmgr, for example.)
--
Mit friedvollen Grüßen
Pete
Spam will be a thing of the past in two years' time.
– Bill Gates, Jan
Am Sat, 26 Jun 2010 10:10:56 +0530 schrieb Venkatesan. S.K. (TNQ):
Undefined control sequence.
l.94 \newXeTeXintercharclass
\...@normalclass %TODO
I suppose some things are seriously broken
May be I can solve it by upgrading to latest Ubuntu
and upgrading
After running xetex on a document to test a new arabic opentype font I got
a final pdf document with completely mixed up characters (brought from the
wrong codepoints and with wrong positioning). You can inspect the output
in the file attached. The source looks like:
\TeXXeTstate=1
El jun 26, 2010, a las 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Fischer escribió:
You need a more recent xelatex.ini. You can get it here
http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/xetex/TRUNK/texmf/tex/xelatex/config/
You will then have to regenerate the format.
Or install a recent texlive.
Ubuntu has been
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:15:02PM +0530, Shrisha Rao wrote:
El jun 26, 2010, a las 5:03 p.m., Ulrike Fischer escribió:
You need a more recent xelatex.ini. You can get it here
http://scripts.sil.org/svn-view/xetex/TRUNK/texmf/tex/xelatex/config/
You will then have to regenerate the
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 01:45:36PM +0400, Abdulrahman Al-Abdusalalm wrote:
After running xetex on a document to test a new arabic opentype font I got
a final pdf document with completely mixed up characters (brought from the
wrong codepoints and with wrong positioning).
My guess is that you
On Saturday 26 June 2010 07:15 PM, Shrisha Rao wrote:
Ubuntu has been well-known to include an out-of-date TeX Live (I
think 2007!) with many long-resolved issues. It is also problematic
to install TeX Live or some parts of it separately if one has already
installed the TeX packages made
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 08:46:38PM +0530, R (Chandra) Chandrasekhar wrote:
On Saturday 26 June 2010 07:15 PM, Shrisha Rao wrote:
Ubuntu has been well-known to include an out-of-date TeX Live (I
think 2007!) with many long-resolved issues. It is also problematic
to install TeX Live or some
Am 26.06.2010 um 17:28 schrieb Khaled Hosny:
I do maintain 4 TeX distributions; texlive from Ubuntu (though I
rarely
use that), texlive 2009/2010 from tug and ConTeXt minimals. It is a
matter of setting PATH properly to activate the distribution I want to
use.
Yes, this scheme might work
On 06/26/2010 03:19 AM, Heiko Oberdiek wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 12:03:32AM +0200, Pablo Rodríguez wrote:
The text-anonymized can be found at
http://www.ousia.tk/xelatex-crasher.tex. Now it crashes on page 13.
[...]
The problem is the footnote broken across pages.
Many thanks for
On 2010-06-15 16:23:33 -0700, Michael Lynch
michael.s.ly...@googlemail.com said:
I've come across a conflict between the unicode-math and acronym packages.
Hi Michael,
Thanks for reporting this. unicode-math gets its definitions from the
STIX fonts, and the complete list (some 2400
My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere.
Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause
this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is enough
to solve this issue.
Regards,
Khaled
an old version should not be
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu wrote:
My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere.
Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause
this kind of issues with xetex, deleting the old version(s) is
On 26 Jun 2010, at 16:46, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu wrote:
My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere.
Having to different version of the same font installed is known to cause
this kind of issues
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 07:58:13PM -0700, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 26 Jun 2010, at 16:46, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 03:04:05PM -0700, wodzi...@math.berkeley.edu wrote:
My guess is that you have an old version of the font installed somewhere.
Having to different version
On 26 Jun 2010, at 21:26, Khaled Hosny wrote:
I was thinking that xetex should always pass the full path to xdvipdfmx,
instead of relaying on the later finding the fonts on it own. But now I
think this would break xdv2pdf which can not load fonts by file path,
right?
Not only for xdv2pdf;
Date: Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:53:39 +0530
From: Shrisha Rao sh...@nyx.net
To: Unicode-based TeX for Mac OS X and other platforms xetex@tug.org
Subject: Re: [XeTeX] Hyphenating Tamil
Message-ID: 0530ce2c-d530-448d-b9c6-b4ae32b80...@nyx.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
El jun 26,
17 matches
Mail list logo
