On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:02 PM, Alan Munn wrote:
On Jul 30, 2010, at 5:28 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 30.07.2010 um 22:55 schrieb Alan Munn:
The only difference I see is that the orientation of the pages is
different. (Not sure what causes that).
Are you using Skim? It somehow
I'm trying to get a range of numbers (of footnotes) for each page. So my
'footnote' macro does \mark{n} right before the footnote symbol in the body
text. Then, in my output routine I'm trying to get the list of footnotes:
\ifx\firstmark\null\count0=0\else\count0=\number\firstmark\fi
Am 31.07.2010 um 02:47 schrieb George:
Did you check whether you have the working xdvipdfmx.cfg file? Is
your TeX
(Live 2009) distribution up-to-date? Are you able to test your code
with
(unfinished, testing) TeX Live 2010?
How do I check that?
Locate the file in your file system(s)
On Jul 31, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Am 31.07.2010 um 03:31 schrieb George:
Text placed on connection lines is misplaced.
Could this help to understand PS Tricks?
\begin{pspicture}(.25\textwidth, 10)
\pnode(0.5,1.1){bottomInstructionLine}
I also wondered about that, and another thing: are you sure that you are
using the \mark commands *after* the note-count has been advanced? My
(personalized) \fn macro has almost at the start:
\global \advance \notenumber by 1
(I have \newcount\notenumber as a standard part of my file
Am 31.07.2010 um 23:47 schrieb Alan Munn:
The issue is why do these drawings end up placing the text in a
different position when compiled with xelatex compared to with latex-
dvips-ps2df.
Ah, I see it now! For a first start I'd recommend to extract the PS
(Tricks) code from the DVI or
On Saturday 31 July 2010 23:25:24 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote:
I would start by looking at your comparison with \null, Ron :
if you look at TB, p.~351, you will see that \null is defined
as \hbox {}, which is a pretty unlikely value for a null mark.
Hi, Phil --
That turns out to
On Sunday 01 August 2010 06:23:19 Ron Aaron wrote:
On Sunday 01 August 2010 00:47:59 John Was wrote:
I wonder if my problem stems from the mark being
inside a vbox? If that's the problem, I don't know how I would get around
it ...
Argggh! That is exactly what my problem is. The \mark{} is
