Re: [XeTeX] manyfoot.sty problems after update to MacTex 2010

2010-09-23 Thread Morten Høgholm
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Talal Al-Azem tala...@fastmail.fm wrote: This EXPL3.sty seems to be having a hard time with calling up or dealing with manyfoot. I will try to find out who the developer is and send him/her the relevant info. expl3 is from the LaTeX Project. A recent change

Re: [XeTeX] Extra trailing space in IPA font with xltxtra

2010-09-23 Thread Paolo Matteucci
2010/9/22 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk P.S. This may be a more elegant solution : [...] \def\implementTIPAtextx#1{\scantokens{#1\endinput}\egroup} Thank you, Phil: that certainly is. 2010/9/22 Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) p.tay...@rhul.ac.uk Ross Moore

Re: [XeTeX] Extra trailing space in IPA font with xltxtra

2010-09-23 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:08:14PM +0100, Paolo Matteucci wrote: Although admittedly it doesn't make much sense to load tipa without loading xltxtra or xunicode as well, if you just load fontspec [v2.1] (*and* tipa, of course), you still get the extra trailing space with the \textipa command,

Re: [XeTeX] Extra trailing space in IPA font with xltxtra

2010-09-23 Thread Will Robertson
On 2010-09-23 20:38:14 +0930, Paolo Matteucci p.n.matteu...@gmail.com said: Therefore *maybe, whatever approach is used to address this bug, the same fix should be applied to fontspec, too...? The \scantokens is somewhere in tipa.sty or its accompanying packages. But the problem only occurs

Re: [XeTeX] Redefining \em and \emph

2010-09-23 Thread Gareth Hughes
Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-09-23 09:07:39 +0930, Gareth Hughes garzoh...@gmail.com said: I'm looking at ways to redefine emphasis within Syriac text (seeing as slanted text is not traditional or pretty). I've got most of the redefinitions working, but I'd also like to redefine \emph as an

[XeTeX] recent changes in XeTeX building

2010-09-23 Thread Mojca Miklavec
Dear list, I do not follow XeTeX development too closely, but I do need to care about our distribution and two platforms on which XeTeX failed to build not that long ago (it was definitely failing back in May) are now both building fine which is great news. However: - on linux the binary is 28 MB

Re: [XeTeX] recent changes in XeTeX building

2010-09-23 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Mojca Miklavec wrote: - Is the 28 MB file on linux normal ? No idea, but on Win32 it is approximately 1/10 of that : 2704Kb. This is as built by ?Akira?/?Tomek? : I do no building myself. Philip Taylor -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List

Re: [XeTeX] recent changes in XeTeX building

2010-09-23 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 06:56:28PM +0100, Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd) wrote: Mojca Miklavec wrote: - Is the 28 MB file on linux normal ? No idea, but on Win32 it is approximately 1/10 of that : 2704Kb. This is as built by ?Akira?/?Tomek? : I do no building myself. IIRC, on

Re: [XeTeX] recent changes in XeTeX building

2010-09-23 Thread Philip Taylor (Webmaster, Ret'd)
Khaled Hosny wrote: IIRC, on Windows the executable is just a wrapper, the actual code is packaged in a form of shared library, this is to work around the lack of symbolic links on some Windows filesystems (on Unix, xelatex is just a symlink to xetex binary, but in windows both are wrappers

Re: [XeTeX] Installation of Texlive on Ubuntu 10.04

2010-09-23 Thread Juan Francisco Fraile Vicente
Thank you very much to all of you. I am installing TL2010 finally. Cheers! 2010/9/22 Kevin Klement klem...@philos.umass.edu You should be able to install Kile from the the Ubuntu repositories rather than building it from source even if you install TeXlive 2010 rather than using the

Re: [XeTeX] Redefining \em and \emph

2010-09-23 Thread Will Robertson
On 2010-09-23 22:20:05 +0930, Gareth Hughes garzoh...@gmail.com said: Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-09-23 09:07:39 +0930, Gareth Hughes garzoh...@gmail.com said: I'm looking at ways to redefine emphasis within Syriac text (seeing as slanted text is not traditional or pretty). I've got most

Re: [XeTeX] recent changes in XeTeX building

2010-09-23 Thread Akira Kakuto
Hi, IIRC, on Windows the executable is just a wrapper, the actual code is packaged in a form of shared library, this is to work around the lack of symbolic links on some Windows filesystems (on Unix, xelatex is just a symlink to xetex binary, but in windows both are wrappers for libxetex of