On 2011-03-01 00:58:45 +1030,
msk...@ansuz.sooke.bc.ca said:
It's important not to override the widths of glyphs because of the common
case I described earlier of a font that is in some meaningful way
monospaced, but doesn't have all characters exactly the same width.
Also note that XeTeX cur
On 01/03/2011, at 1:28 AM, Vadim Radionov wrote:
> one side-effect of your patch is that now, afaics, WordSpace multipliers work
> cumulatively in
>
> \newfontfamily\russianfont[Mapping=tex-text,Script=Cyrillic,WordSpace={1.4,.9,.8},
> SmallCapsFeatures={LetterSpace=5,WordSpace={1.5,1,1}}]{Char
Hi, Will
one side-effect of your patch is that now, afaics, WordSpace multipliers
work cumulatively in
\newfontfamily\russianfont[Mapping=tex-text,Script=Cyrillic,WordSpace={1.4,.9,.8},
SmallCapsFeatures={LetterSpace=5,WordSpace={1.5,1,1}}]{CharterITC}
while they were unrelated before.
Vadim
O
On Sun, 27 Feb 2011, Tobias Schoel wrote:
> If the monospace option is set by hand for non-monospaced fonts, how will the
> letters be positioned in the monospaced grid? How should the following pattern
> look?
I only envision the monospace option as affecting the width of TeX's word
and sentence
If the monospace option is set by hand for non-monospaced fonts, how
will the letters be positioned in the monospaced grid? How should the
following pattern look?
mmm
mim
ciao
Toscho
Am 27.02.2011 17:32, schrieb Peter Dyballa:
Am 27.02.2011 um 06:32 schrieb Will Robertson:
Could we measur
