Thanks, that works.
Is there anyway to control the placement of the numbers? They look good
besides the introductory material but once the text proper begins, they
are pressed right up against the text.
Here is a minimal example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{pstricks}
Hi All,
Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between XeLaTeX
and LaTeX typesettings?
Thanks,
Suresh
This email and any accompanying attachments is for the sole use of the intended
recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any
unauthorized
I could not be bothered looking through lineno.sty to see what setups they
have so this is another quick/dirty fix. The problem is that in the
definition of \MakeLineNo, they use \sbox, \sbox itself uses
\s...@color.bidi changes the definition of \set@colorwhen color/xcolor
package is loaded such
By the way, I do not know why you are using ednotes.sty. If it is because of
footnote support, bidi package also allows you to do paragraph footnotes.
For more details, see bidi manual. ednotes is not supported by bidi and its
use together with bidi should be avoided.
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 5:16
2011/9/21 Suresh Avvarulakshmi, Integra-PDY, IN
suresh.avvarulaks...@integra.co.in:
Hi All,
Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between
XeLaTeX and LaTeX typesettings?
I do not know but it can be said quite simply. In any case, it is
Lamport's LaTeX with
2. XeLaTeX cannot use microtypographical extensions but it may change
in the future. Currently pdflatex or lualatex is needed.
Actually there are already experimental versions of XeTeX lying around
that have some microtypographical features, see:
http://xetex.tk/mediawiki/index.php/Main_Page
suresh.avvarulaks...@integra.co.in:
Hi All,
Are they any comparisons documents, which shows the difference between
XeLaTeX and LaTeX typesettings?
There can't be any. Both pass the TRIP test.
--
Greetings
Pete
The problem with the French is that they don't have a word for «
Hello,
I've been using LaTeX to typeset math for years, but just recently I decided
to upgrade to XeLaTeX in order to include Hebrew. I've come across the
following problem. Chapter 2 of the bidi package document (version 1.3.0,
page 15) claims that the bidi package supports the hyperref
Hello,
I've been using LaTeX to typeset math for years, but just recently I decided
to upgrade to XeLaTeX in order to include Hebrew. I've come across the
following problem. Chapter 2 of the bidi package document (version 1.3.0,
page 15) claims that the bidi package supports the hyperref
For how long have bidi and ednotes been incompatible? François Charette ,
who maintains arabxetex and works on polyglossia, wrote an example file
showing how to use arabxetex + bidi with ednotes to produce critical
editions, so I assumed there would be some effort to keep the packages
Yes, of course you are right. However, many of the older LaTeX packages
are not being developed very actively any more (or not at all in some
cases) so it makes it difficult to decide what to use when one need the
functionality of some of the older packages but also wants to work with
unicode,
11 matches
Mail list logo
