Hi there folks,
I have gotten used to write vectors in my documents as $\vec{v}$.
$\vec$, basically, is a mathbf. Naturally, if I have vectors v_1,
v_2, v_3, I'd like to write \vec{v_1}, \vec{v_2}, \vec{v_3}. But
here, I want to mathbf only the `v`. Thus I used this ugly hack,
contributed by
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/10/30 Michaël Cadilhac mich...@cadilhac.name:
Hi there folks,
How about the following solution? I am writing it directly to the mail
without testing, I hope I won't make any error.
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Herbert Schulz he...@wideopenwest.com wrote:
On Oct 30, 2012, at 1:21 AM, Michaël Cadilhac mich...@cadilhac.name wrote:
Hi there folks,
I have gotten used to write vectors in my documents as $\vec{v}$.
$\vec$, basically, is a mathbf. Naturally, if I have
This document:
http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/attachments/20090929/921178b4/attachment-0001.tex
which I wrote three years ago has some code to handle optional _ and ^
suffixes. I probably don't have the time to adapt it to this situation, but
this means that it is theoretically possible.
BTW, I
2012/10/30 Michaël Cadilhac mich...@cadilhac.name:
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Zdenek Wagner zdenek.wag...@gmail.com
wrote:
2012/10/30 Michaël Cadilhac mich...@cadilhac.name:
Hi there folks,
How about the following solution? I am writing it directly to the mail
without testing, I
Hi Michaël,
On 31/10/2012, at 1:39 AM, Michaël Cadilhac wrote:
Howdy,
\vec{v}_1 ?
Herb,
Thanks, but of course, I'd like to avoid going through hundreds of pages (ok,
a script would be easy to write, but still...). Also, I'd like to keep the
semantics \vec{T} is for a vector T,
