Dear Philip,
Unable to update the static FcBlanks: 0x0600
Unable to update the static FcBlanks: 0x0601
Unable to update the static FcBlanks: 0x0602
Unable to update the static FcBlanks: 0x0603
Unable to update the static FcBlanks: 0x06dd
Unable to update the static FcBlanks: 0x070f
Unable to upd
2016-02-19 4:25 GMT+01:00 Kamal Abdali :
>
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 7:38 PM, Zdenek Wagner
> wrote:
>
>> I have compared both and personally I like Jonathan's version. Of course,
>> I am not an expert. I do not have any collection of high quality Urdu
>> documents. I have only seen Mirza Ghalib'
On 18/2/16 23:39, Kamal Abdali wrote:
On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Jonathan Kew mailto:jfkth...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Here's an example in Urdu script. There are 3 pages, all containing
the exact same text.
Page 1 has \XeTeXinterwordspaceshaping = 0, so this is what existing
x
I think this is a phenomenal step. I don't think it's a specialized feature —
it actually opens up a completely different usage field for XeTeX. The past
treatment (single-word shaping) was making XeTeX difficult to deal with for
purposes eg. of automated font testing or typesetting documents th
Hi Zdeněk,
Kudos! You figured one out correctly, and got only close on the second one
because I gave you the wrong clue! Sorry. The two word-separated parsings
of the second text are:
جمالو ہار گیا۔
جما لوہار گیا۔
meaning: " Jamaloo was defeated" and "The ironsmith Jumma has left". While
w
It is worth remembering that the described tampered web font scenario
doesn't normally apply to XeTeX use scenarios.
Den 19 feb 2016 06:26 skrev "maxwell" :
> There is a vulnerability in the Graphite library:
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/vulnerability-in-font-processing-library-affects-linux
2016-02-19 16:26 GMT+01:00 Kamal Abdali :
> Hi Zdeněk,
>
> Kudos! You figured one out correctly, and got only close on the second one
> because I gave you the wrong clue! Sorry. The two word-separated parsings
> of the second text are:
> جمالو ہار گیا۔
>
جما لوہار گیا۔
>
Thank you, now it
Le 19/02/16 à 16h55, Zdenek Wagner
a écrit :
> I know another funny transliteration from Czech. Under socialism we
> had Socialist Youth Union. Union is "svaz" in Czech and the member of
> this union was usually called "svazák" (the first vowel is short, the
> second vowel is long). And if you tr
Denis Bitouzé wrote:
> Ha, ha, ha, so funny ! (I didn't understand anything ;)
According to Mr Google, "سوزاک" translates to "gonorrhoea"
(blennorragie) ...
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo
2016-02-19 17:37 GMT+01:00 Philip Taylor :
>
>
> Denis Bitouzé wrote:
>
> > Ha, ha, ha, so funny ! (I didn't understand anything ;)
>
> According to Mr Google, "سوزاک" translates to "gonorrhoea"
> (blennorragie) ...
>
> Google is right. And if you buy Teach Yourself Urdu from Amazon, you find
it t
On 19/02/2016 01:06, Jonathan Kew wrote:
> So... that was an interesting and thought-provoking suggestion, but at
> this point I think I'm inclined towards keeping the existing model. To
> me, it makes sense to think of these as increasing levels of support,
> rather than as independent features.
If you take a simple latex file like:
\documentclass{article}\usepackage{lipsum}\usepackage{amsgen}\begin{document}\lipsum[1-10]\end{document}
and run latex, pdflatex or lualatex repated times (on the same file) you
get the SAME dvi or pdf file up to an internal DATE and ID in the file --
and eve
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 5:46 PM, Paulo Ney de Souza wrote:
>
> If you take a simple latex file like:
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{lipsum}
> \usepackage{amsgen}
> \begin{document}
> \lipsum[1-10]
> \end{document}
> and run latex, pdflatex or lualatex repated times (on the same file) you g
Why is it so? And what generates this difference? The question has been
lingering on SX for a while
http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/292675/why-does-xelatex-produce-different-files-from-the-same-deterministic-sources
but with no reasonable answer!
I wrote a possible answer on SX.
Best,
Ak
14 matches
Mail list logo
