Hi,
I looked through the attachments to the previous postings, and some of the
images are consistent with the positioning feature being turned off.
That may now be fixed for FreeSerif.
However there were some that showed a completely wrong mark appearing,
far from the base mark. I have no idea
Hi Jonathan,
You may have a point, although I don't think it's the whole story.
(Most of what follows is font-techy. Upshot is: I did find suspicious
issues in FreeFont, and have now fixed them.)
The font feature in FreeSerif that positions generic marks like these is
mark ('generic marks
čt 16. 5. 2019 v 14:30 odesílatel Jonathan Kew napsal:
>
> On 16/05/2019 12:31, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
> > Am Mon, 13 May 2019 17:52:17 +0200 schrieb François Patte:
> >
> >> I have just made a fresh install of texlive 2019 and encountered a
> >> problem with the diacritical marks of romanized
On 16/05/2019 12:31, Ulrike Fischer wrote:
Am Mon, 13 May 2019 17:52:17 +0200 schrieb François Patte:
I have just made a fresh install of texlive 2019 and encountered a
problem with the diacritical marks of romanized sanskrit.
Do the 'dev2' script tables in FreeSerif include positioning
Am Wed, 15 May 2019 05:36:36 +0200 schrieb Janusz S. Bień:
> The *.bb files was created for make4ht. Till recently they had no effect
> on XeLaTeX,
They always had an effect on xelatex: if a bb-file is found it is
used.
> now they cause scaling down (except a few, which is another
>
Am Mon, 13 May 2019 17:52:17 +0200 schrieb François Patte:
> I have just made a fresh install of texlive 2019 and encountered a
> problem with the diacritical marks of romanized sanskrit.
(copied from f.c.t.t):
One can see it with plain xetex too, and it is not the font (I'm
forcing it to
