Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX/xdvipdfmx: PDF text copying with double encoded fonts

Thank you for building this. I'm not familiar with w32tex, can users replace the same file from their TexLive 2017 installation? On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:31 PM, Akira Kakuto wrote: > Hi Jiang, > >> So there might still be value to fix the ToUnicode map, don't you think?

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX/xdvipdfmx: PDF text copying with double encoded fonts

ctually you can ignore rest of the change and only take the is_PUA_or_presentation() change.) On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 6:59 AM, Jiang Jiang <gzjj...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:38 AM Akira Kakuto <kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp> > wrote: >> >

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX/xdvipdfmx: PDF text copying with double encoded fonts

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:38 AM Akira Kakuto wrote: > Dear Jiang, > > > There has been a report > > > > https://github.com/CTeX-org/ctex-kit/issues/286 > > % XeTeX > \XeTeXgenerateactualtext=1 > \font\1="Source Han Sans SC" > \font\2="Source Han Serif SC" >

[XeTeX] XeTeX/xdvipdfmx: PDF text copying with double encoded fonts

Hi, There has been a report https://github.com/CTeX-org/ctex-kit/issues/286 (in Chinese) in summary, fonts such as Source Han Sans/Serif encoded U+5B50 and U+2F74 using the same glyph so that our reverse ToUnicode CMap building seems to prefer U+2F74 which is not the expected result. (U+2F74

Re: [XeTeX] New feature planned for xetex

Hi Jonathan,I suppose not everyone have a chance to build and try this yet. By any chance you can provide a PDF test case demonstrating the feature? Then perhaps more people can comment.- Jiang _ From: Jonathan Kew Sent: 星期四, 二月 18, 2016 7:00

Re: [XeTeX] Fwd: [tex-live] XeTeX or xdvipdfmx Broken on Mac

On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 8:14 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Simon, On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Simon Cozens si...@simon-cozens.org wrote: On 26/04/2015 23:18, Zdenek Wagner wrote: I pushed a fix in r37053, both ITF Devanagari and Kohinoor Devanagari works for me now. I'm

Re: [XeTeX] Fwd: [tex-live] XeTeX or xdvipdfmx Broken on Mac

Hi Simon, On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:57 AM, Simon Cozens si...@simon-cozens.org wrote: On 26/04/2015 23:18, Zdenek Wagner wrote: I pushed a fix in r37053, both ITF Devanagari and Kohinoor Devanagari works for me now. I'm still seeing problems with Kohinoor Devanagari, even after the two

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

Hi Akira, On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:42 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Thanks very much for your great work. r34836 is working fine. r34831 caused regressions in xdvipdfmx ToUnicode generation, r34848 fixed that. - Jiang --

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Jiang , I have committed a better fix as r34805. Thanks a lot, Jiang. It works fine for the example. However, unfortunately, invalid toUnicode problem for non-CJK fonts, fixed by Khaled, has reappeared. I

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 8:24 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 4:45 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Jiang , I have committed a better fix as r34805. Thanks a lot, Jiang. It works fine for the example. However, unfortunately, invalid

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Jiang, Please let me know if there are any further issues. I think r34832 is great. Thanks a lot. However, if I use TrueType fonts in XeTeX (.ttf or .ttc), xdvipdfmx crashes with the message: otf_cmap

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Khaled, Jiang, I found that r34804 of dvipdfmx could not create a pdf for a simple vertical text by using SourceHanSansJP, while r34711 of dvipdfmx could create a fine pdf for the same text. I attach a file

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Khaled, Jiang, I found that r34804 of dvipdfmx could not create a pdf for a simple vertical text by using SourceHanSansJP, while r34711

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:28 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote

Re: [XeTeX] r34804 fails to typeset a vertical Japanese, for which r34711 works fine

On Sun, Aug 3, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Jiang, I have committed a better fix as r34805. Thanks a lot, Jiang. It works fine for the example. Anyone feel like trying out the following patches? https://gist.github.com/jjgod/0d4b6339d761a5423f82 Patch

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Hi Khaled, Let hope we have enough time before the next release to make sure it is :) xdvipdfmx r34745 (after applying the patch by Jiang) sometimes crashes at --- cff.c.origMon Jul 28 08:50:32 2014 +++

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

Hi Akira, On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 8:10 AM, Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com wrote: Thank you Akira, I can reproduce this, will take a look. https://gist.github.com/jjgod/cf39032b839bb3542107 should fix the crashes for you. - Jiang

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote: On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:45:38PM +0900, Akira Kakuto wrote: Hi Khaled, This is a development tree after all, so bugs are to be expected. Lets debug those issues first then decide what we want to do. OK, agreed.

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:28 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 07:18:10PM +0200, Jiang Jiang wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:01:32AM +0200, Jiang Jiang wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

Since the old patches no longer apply, I updated https://gist.github.com/jjgod/c1194a9b371848aaa746 with first patch rewritten. As you all can see, it is possible to do it in legacy dvipdfm-x code, just more tedious, I'm not sure what benefit that gives. Then again, I don't care that much as long

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 6:27 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 09:01:32AM +0200, Jiang Jiang wrote: Hi, On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Peter Breitenlohner p...@mppmu.mpg.de wrote: On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Jiang Jiang wrote: Since Peter

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

Hi Khaled, Since Peter is not responding, what do you think of this patch? Should I go ahead and commit this to TeXLive repository? People had been using it for a few days with various CID-keyed fonts and haven't reported any more issue. - Jiang

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

Hi Akira, On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Dear Jiang Jiang, In case you or anyone else are interested, I just posted two patches to xdvipdfmx to fix this problem: https://gist.github.com/jjgod/c1194a9b371848aaa746 Thanks very much. I've

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 1:40 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Dear Jiang Jiang, But there are many warnings, probably for non-CJK fonts: The warnings disappear if I apply an attached patch: type0.c.diff. I'm not sure if the last section is correct as it will very likely

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

Hi, On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 3:12 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Dear Jiang Jiang , I will take a look at the warnings for non-CJK fonts. Thanks. In addition, I think it is necessary to refine for dvipdfmx. The patched sources do not compile as dvipdfmx. Right, I can

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:11 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Dear Jiang Jiang , I will take a look at the warnings for non-CJK fonts. If I use your Type0Font_create_ToUnicode_stream(font); for case CIDFONT_TYPE2: and the original otf_create_ToUnicode_stream

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Sat, Jul 19, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Dear Jiang Jiang, Yes, if you look at the logic there, it was trying to resolve the ToUnicode CMap by first attempting to load SourceHanSansJP-UTF16-H in texmf tree (with kpathsea), if this couldn't be found

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 12:50 AM, Akira Kakuto kak...@fuk.kindai.ac.jp wrote: Dear Jiang Jiang, I updated the gist (https://gist.github.com/jjgod/c1194a9b371848aaa746) again to fix the following issues: Thank you very much. I think all is ok now. It compiles as the driver dvipdfmx

Re: [XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 10:52 AM, Dohyun Kim nomosno...@gmail.com wrote: 2014-07-18 0:00 GMT+09:00 Jiang Jiang gzjj...@gmail.com: Hi, I wonder if this has been discussed before but I have been wondering if CID-keyed fonts are supported by XeTeX/xdvipdfmx at all. Recent release of Source Han

[XeTeX] CID-keyed font support?

Hi, I wonder if this has been discussed before but I have been wondering if CID-keyed fonts are supported by XeTeX/xdvipdfmx at all. Recent release of Source Han Sans [1] brought up the question again. If you install Source Han Sans CN Regular for instance, the following document:

Re: [XeTeX] XeLaTeX, xeCJK, Japanese: some general questions

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 3:30 AM, Wilfred van Rooijen wvanrooi...@yahoo.com wrote: I prefer memoir. In fact, this is one of the things I remember from when I was looking at gloss-japanese. the problem is that for instance the chapter headings need to become 第1章, but most documentclasses