Re: [XeTeX] \textsuperscript and \textsubscript size

2010-11-07 Thread BPJ
2010-11-06 21:25, Peter Dyballa skrev: Am 06.11.2010 um 20:08 schrieb BPJ: Is it an optical illusion, or is the size of \textsuperscript and \textsubscript rather like \tiny than like \scriptsize? Sometimes is neither this nor that but a decision of the font designer – some fonts have subsc

Re: [XeTeX] \textsuperscript and \textsubscript size

2010-11-06 Thread Peter Dyballa
Am 06.11.2010 um 20:08 schrieb BPJ: Is it an optical illusion, or is the size of \textsuperscript and \textsubscript rather like \tiny than like \scriptsize? Sometimes is neither this nor that but a decision of the font designer – some fonts have subscript and superscript glyphs! -- Gree

Re: [XeTeX] \textsuperscript and \textsubscript size

2010-11-06 Thread Philipp Stephani
Am 06.11.2010 um 20:08 schrieb BPJ: > Is it an optical illusion, or is the size of \textsuperscript and > \textsubscript rather like \tiny than like \scriptsize? minimal example please, latex.ltx does explicitly switch to the script size, but of course any package can override that --

Re: [XeTeX] \textsuperscript and \textsubscript size

2010-11-06 Thread Heiko Oberdiek
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 08:08:24PM +0100, BPJ wrote: > Is it an optical illusion, or is the size of \textsuperscript and > \textsubscript rather like \tiny than like \scriptsize? It depends on the font size context, thus the size can even be larger than \normalsize: \documentclass{article} \begi

[XeTeX] \textsuperscript and \textsubscript size

2010-11-06 Thread BPJ
Is it an optical illusion, or is the size of \textsuperscript and \textsubscript rather like \tiny than like \scriptsize? /bpj -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.: http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex