Was that a sarcastic answer? How would one go about accomplishing that?
Teach it to use OS font services instead of TeX mechanisms!
--
Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, etc.:
http://tug.org/mailman/listinfo/xetex
Am 10.05.2011 um 10:53 schrieb Ron Aaron:
Was that a sarcastic answer?
Not really. It's more of an inability to imagine something else, which
is not complicated.
How would one go about accomplishing that?
Writing code that fits into xdvipdfmx and augments it.
--
Greetings
Pete
So the correct answer would have been: I don't know of a way to do that
without changing xdvipdfmx.
On 05/10/2011 12:12 PM, Peter Dyballa wrote:
Not really. It's more of an inability to imagine something else, which
is not complicated.
How would one go about accomplishing that?
Writing
Am 10.05.2011 um 14:09 schrieb Ron Aaron:
So the correct answer would have been: I don't know of a way to do
that
without changing xdvipdfmx.
No. (Could you be so kind to read my answers again? Maybe my English
is a bit too bad to express in a comprehensible way what I thought I
could
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 18:28, Ron Aaron wrote:
Hi all -
Is there a way to test -- from within a XeTeX document -- for the
presence of a font, without causing the run to fail if the font doesn't
exist?
There is a parameter
\suppressfontnotfounderror
that you probably want to set to 1 and
Hi all -
Is there a way to test -- from within a XeTeX document -- for the
presence of a font, without causing the run to fail if the font doesn't
exist?
I would like to be able to do something like:
\fontexists{Libertine}
\iffontexists ... \else ... \fi
Thanks,
Ron
Came up with the following:
\newif\iffontexists
\def\fontexists#1{
\fontexistsfalse
\batchmode
\font\tstfnt=#1
\errorstopmode
\ifnum\strcmp{\fontname\tstfnt}{#1}=0
\fontexiststrue
\fi
}
It works, but is there an easier way?
Am 09.05.2011 um 21:15 schrieb Ron Aaron:
It works, but is there an easier way?
See the list archive near the end of last august!
--
Greetings
Pete
Clovis' Consideration of an Atmospheric Anomaly:
The perversity of nature is nowhere better demonstrated than
by the fact that,
