Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX and luaTeX

2010-06-05 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 06/04/2010 01:42 PM, Arthur Reutenauer wrote: In a recent thread here, luaTeX was said to be the intended eventual replacement for pdfTeX. This piece of information is based on earlier plans of the pdfTeX and LuaTeX teams, when the intention was indeed that LuaTeX would become pdfTeX 2.0

[XeTeX] XeTeX and luaTeX

2010-06-04 Thread Kirk Lowery
In a recent thread here, luaTeX was said to be the intended eventual replacement for pdfTeX. Since luaTeX is Unicode-based, and handles OpenType fonts, what is the future of XeTeX? Will XeTeX continue to be developed? Should we be following and experimenting with luaTeX in anticipation of a move

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX and luaTeX

2010-06-04 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
to OpenType font handling, Unicode, etc. LuaTeX and XeTeX have had completely different development paths from the beginning (apart from their common origin as extensions of Knuth's TeX), and they serve different needs. I personally use both for completely different purposes (through the macro package

Re: [XeTeX] XeTeX and luaTeX

2010-06-04 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Is there any kind of feature comparison between XeTeX and luaTeX? None that I know of. My primary needs are, besides general (La)TeX functionality, Unicode processing of combining characters and handling of OpenType fonts. The output should