Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Thanks. The difference seems to be in the bidi version. I have been using version 13.5 dated 2013/05/28, from TeX Live 2013 pretest, while you (Wilfred) are using version 12.2 dated 2013/04/04 -- presumably from the frozen TeX Live 2012. I can actually reproduce the behaviour you're observing

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
r 9000  1144 hyphenation exceptions out of 8191  70i,13n,67p,940b,726s stack positions out of 5000i,500n,1p,20b,5s Output written on test1.pdf (3 pages). >________ > From: Arthur Reutenauer >To: Wilfred van Rooijen ; XeTeX (Unicode-based TeX) >d

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> Well, it works OK on my computer, but note that the "DRAFT" shows up in a > rather strange place... Well, that's progress ;-) What version of all these packages are you using? Arthur -- Subscriptions, Archive, and List information, e

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Yes, I meant in your example. Since the problem is in the interaction between xwatermark and bidi, I'm not surprised that the pages that fail are the ones with watermarks on them. I have no solution for that, and don't really have the time to look into it, sorry. If what you want is to add w

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Wilfred van Rooijen
M >Subject: Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken > > > >Hi Arthur, I have already tested that but what happen is the output document >is empty. > > > > >On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Arthur Reutenauer > wrote: > >        Hello, >&g

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Fahad Al-Saidi
not only the first page if you change the xwatermark' range . For example if you set the watermark for every page, the entire document will be empty. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Arthur Reutenauer < arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org> wrote: > > Hi Arthur, I have already tested that but what h

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
> Hi Arthur, I have already tested that but what happen is the output > document is empty. Oh right, I see that now. You mean only the first page, the one that contains the watermark? I hadn't notice before. Arthur -- Subscriptions, Ar

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Fahad Al-Saidi
Hi Arthur, I have already tested that but what happen is the output document is empty. On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Arthur Reutenauer < arthur.reutena...@normalesup.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I can confirm that with TeX Live 2013 pretest. The problem is that > xwatermark needs hyper

Re: [XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Arthur Reutenauer
Hello, I can confirm that with TeX Live 2013 pretest. The problem is that xwatermark needs hyperref but postpones it inclusion until the end of the preamble, and that bidi wants to be loaded last, as you can see from the error message. Hence both packages fight to be included last.

[XeTeX] bidi & xwatermark are broken

2013-06-12 Thread Fahad Al-Saidi
Hi All, In my search for a package to replace wallpaper. I am testing xwatermarks package. I encounter this error: ! Package bidi Error: Oops! you have loaded package hyperref after bidi package . Please load package hyperref before bidi package, and then try to run xelatex on your document ag