Re: [XeTeX] bug in fontspec?

2010-10-19 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Oct 18, 2010, at 8:36 PM, Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-10-19 03:30:24 +1030, Pablo Rodríguez oi...@web.de said: as Ulrike Fischer has noticed (http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2010-October/018895.html), fontspec enters in a loop italics are defined as slanted: \def\itdefault{sl}

Re: [XeTeX] bug in fontspec?

2010-10-19 Thread Herbert Schulz
On Oct 19, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-10-19 22:55:23 +1030, Herbert Schulz he...@wideopenwest.com said: ... Is the fix for the expl3 problem local to fontspec too (i.e., in this updat e) or will that need a change to expl3? The updated version of fontspec should fix

Re: [XeTeX] bug in fontspec?

2010-10-19 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 10/19/2010 03:36 AM, Will Robertson wrote: On 2010-10-19 03:30:24 +1030, Pablo Rodríguez oi...@web.de said: as Ulrike Fischer has noticed (http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2010-October/018895.html), fontspec enters in a loop italics are defined as slanted: \def\itdefault{sl} This problem,

Re: [XeTeX] bug in fontspec?

2010-10-18 Thread Philipp Stephani
Am 18.10.2010 um 19:21 schrieb Khaled Hosny: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:00:24PM +0200, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: Hi Will, Khaled and others, as Ulrike Fischer has noticed (http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2010-October/018895.html), fontspec enters in a loop italics are defined as slanted:

Re: [XeTeX] bug in fontspec?

2010-10-18 Thread Pablo Rodríguez
On 10/18/2010 07:21 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 07:00:24PM +0200, Pablo Rodríguez wrote: [...] I have no idea how this would be fixed, but github issue tracker[1] is the proper place to report bug, at least to make sure it get noticed and not lost in mailing lists. [1]

Re: [XeTeX] bug in fontspec?

2010-10-18 Thread Will Robertson
On 2010-10-19 03:30:24 +1030, Pablo Rodríguez oi...@web.de said: as Ulrike Fischer has noticed (http://tug.org/pipermail/xetex/2010-October/018895.html), fontspec enters in a loop italics are defined as slanted: \def\itdefault{sl} This problem, funnily enough, has existed pretty