I downloaded the 2013-02-24 version of xetex-w32.tar.xz from a
w32tex.org mirror and installed xetex.exe (2013-02-24 09:40 AM). I
used it to compile a 500+ page document. This time xetex.exe didn't
crash and I didn't see any underbrace problems.
Thank you to Khaled (xetex source code) and Akira
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 07:31:08PM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 6:48 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
I tried to cross compile XeTeX for Windows from my Linux machine,
the resulting binary is here:
http://www.khaledhosny.org/files/tmp/xetex.exe
I
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
If you can send me the file(s) that caused the crash, I'll try to debug,
most likely it is a bug I introduced.
Then is it likely that the problem would show up on a Linux build of
Linux as well, and not just on a win32
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 11:07:06AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
If you can send me the file(s) that caused the crash, I'll try to debug,
most likely it is a bug I introduced.
Then is it likely that the problem
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
The issue is now fixed in git repository.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/
This link references http://tug.org/texlive/build.html which lists
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:05 AM, Daniel Greenhoe dgreen...@gmail.com wrote:
Does this mean that the fix by Khaled did not make it into the latest
win32 binary? Would anyone happen to know when a fixed one might
possibly be available?
P.S. Sorry for all the whining.
Dan
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013
On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:05:16AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
The issue is now fixed in git repository.
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
Thanks for reproducing the issue. This is clearly an engine bug (unlike
old TeX, the over/under braces are handled solely by the engine not
constructed by macros).
I’ll try to debug this now it is reproducible, but whatever fix I can
come up with will not be available before the next XeTeX
The issue is now fixed in git repository.
Regards,
Khaled
On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:48:51AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Thanks for reproducing the issue. This is clearly an engine bug (unlike
old TeX, the over/under braces are handled solely by the engine not
constructed by macros).
I’ll
Is the git repository that you are using accessible only to the
unicode-math developers, or to anyone with git software
(http://git-scm.com/ or http://msysgit.github.com/ or ?) installed on
their machine?
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:41 PM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
The issue is now
http://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/
But there are lots of new stuff, so bugs are expected. Use on your own.
Regards,
Khaled
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:15:16AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
Is the git repository that you are using accessible only to the
unicode-math developers, or to anyone
Thanks for all your hard work!
Dan
On Sat, Feb 9, 2013 at 6:53 AM, Khaled Hosny khaledho...@eglug.org wrote:
http://sourceforge.net/p/xetex/code/
But there are lots of new stuff, so bugs are expected. Use on your own.
Regards,
Khaled
On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 05:15:16AM +0800, Daniel
I’ve seen this once with OpenType math fonts, but I wasn’t able to
reproduce it again. Trying using the same fonts in your minimal example,
since it is probably and OpenType math-only issue.
Regards,
Khaled
On Wed, Feb 06, 2013 at 11:13:51AM +0800, Daniel Greenhoe wrote:
I did make a quick
13 matches
Mail list logo
