Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] Re: DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200

2003-10-31 Thread Raymond Jennings
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED],"DRI developer's list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] Re: DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200 Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:04:20 + On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > manu wrote:

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] Re: DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200

2003-10-31 Thread Keith Whitwell
I was pretty sure that the snapshots did staticly link with libexpat.a. I remember there being some discussion about this. Once XFree86 4.4.0 hits the streets this particular problem will be moot. AFAIK, XFree86 4.4.0 will include libexpat. However, I still think that the default should be

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] Re: DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200

2003-10-31 Thread Ian Romanick
Alan Hourihane wrote: On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: manu wrote: Responding to myself : sorry it seems that the problem is because the r200_dri.so module is linked against libexpat.so.1 which is not on my system. So I just made a link to the one I had and all is

Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [XFree86] Re: DRI weirdnesses for RADEON 9200

2003-10-31 Thread Alan Hourihane
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 05:07:33PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote: > manu wrote: > > >Le 30.10.2003 17:07:54, manu a écrit : > > > >>So I ran glxinfo see below which told me that Direct Rendering is not > >>enabled! This is crazy as you can check in the XFree log (file > >>attached). > >>Hope someo