Re: [XFree86] Feature Request: Better X11 Compression for client/server

2003-06-29 Thread Egbert Eich
Mark Vojkovich writes: > On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Boris Reisig wrote: > > > Its seems that client/server applications are being used more and more now > > adays. XFree86 is excellent for a client/server setup on a local network > > but it seems that X11 can easily saturate the bandwidth with many

Re: [XFree86] Feature Request: Better X11 Compression for client/server

2003-06-28 Thread Peter \"Firefly\" Lund
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Consider SSH. I doubt that any compression (including that which is > part of SSH) will make X good over a dial modem, but it does work. I http://www.nomachine.com/index.php -Peter Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day; Give him a reli

Re: [XFree86] Feature Request: Better X11 Compression for client/server

2003-06-28 Thread Mark Vojkovich
On Sat, 28 Jun 2003, Boris Reisig wrote: > Its seems that client/server applications are being used more and more now > adays. XFree86 is excellent for a client/server setup on a local network > but it seems that X11 can easily saturate the bandwidth with many clients. > (Which can then start slow

[XFree86] Feature Request: Better X11 Compression for client/server

2003-06-28 Thread Boris Reisig
Its seems that client/server applications are being used more and more now adays. XFree86 is excellent for a client/server setup on a local network but it seems that X11 can easily saturate the bandwidth with many clients. (Which can then start slowing down the entire network as more and more users