On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
> >OK. I tested with both the generic int10 module from 4.2 and
> > from 4.3 on a 4.3 system. This was with two NVIDIA cards and the
> > nv driver on both heads.
>
> > 4.2 libint10.a works fi
On Tue, 18 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>OK. I tested with both the generic int10 module from 4.2 and
> from 4.3 on a 4.3 system. This was with two NVIDIA cards and the
> nv driver on both heads.
> 4.2 libint10.a works fine.
> 4.3 linux/libint10.a works fine.
> 4.3 libint10.a does
OK. I tested with both the generic int10 module from 4.2 and
from 4.3 on a 4.3 system. This was with two NVIDIA cards and the
nv driver on both heads.
4.2 libint10.a works fine.
4.3 linux/libint10.a works fine.
4.3 libint10.a does not post the card properly.
It appears as though the
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > > Has it been firmly established that this is a regression
> > > and 4.2 worked fine on those machines?
You can verify this by using the generic int10 module from one of our ix86
binary packages for 4.2.0 or 4.2.1.
> > It's not clear to me that yo
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
> > On 14 Mar 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 12:31, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > > >Could someone put the FreeBSD int10 module from 4.3 someplace where I
> > > > can get it?
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 12:31, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> > >Could someone put the FreeBSD int10 module from 4.3 someplace where I
> > > can get it? I'll give it a try.
You already have it. (Or should.) The tw
On 14 Mar 2003, Eric Anholt wrote:
> On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 12:31, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> >Could someone put the FreeBSD int10 module from 4.3 someplace where I
> > can get it? I'll give it a try.
>
> I put one from my system up at:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files/libint10.a
>
On Fri, 2003-03-14 at 12:31, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>Could someone put the FreeBSD int10 module from 4.3 someplace where I
> can get it? I'll give it a try.
I put one from my system up at:
http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/X/files/libint10.a
--
Eric Anholt[EMA
Could someone put the FreeBSD int10 module from 4.3 someplace where I
can get it? I'll give it a try.
Mark.
On Fri, 14 Mar 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>
> > I've seen a couple of these reports now, where 4.3 repor
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
> I've seen a couple of these reports now, where 4.3 reports
> "Truncating PCI BIOS Length" with multihead configurations and
> doesn't work. I just tried two "nv" cards with 4.3 under Linux
> and it worked fine. Perhaps this is specific to FreeBSD?
Em Quinta 13 Março 2003 22:42, Eric Anholt escreveu:
> Two other people have reported problems with FreeBSD dualhead setups.
> One had a Radeon 9700 + Matrox Millenium II, and the log ends very
> similarly (Truncating PCI BIOS Length).
I had the same problem in my Red Hat Linux and XFree 4.2.0.
On Thu, 2003-03-13 at 16:42, Paul Boehmer wrote:
> Occurs on both FreeBSD 4.8-RC and 5.0-Current (different systems) with mix
> of Nvidia AGP card and Matrox PCI cards. Run command "startx" looks like
> it initializes the agp but locks up the console so that only physical
> reset will bring system
I've seen a couple of these reports now, where 4.3 reports
"Truncating PCI BIOS Length" with multihead configurations and
doesn't work. I just tried two "nv" cards with 4.3 under Linux
and it worked fine. Perhaps this is specific to FreeBSD? Is
there someone here who knows the int10 code and
Occurs on both FreeBSD 4.8-RC and 5.0-Current (different systems) with mix
of Nvidia AGP card and Matrox PCI cards. Run command "startx" looks like
it initializes the agp but locks up the console so that only physical
reset will bring system back up.
Worked fine in 4.2.1 and when running just a s
14 matches
Mail list logo
