Re: Re: Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-12-18 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Sat, 18 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: Marc later I identified it and confirmed that ther was no issue with write of 0x7c. In the meantime I was going through the PCI code of XFree86 file "sparcPci.c" in function sparcPciInit (). I came across the following expression for mapping the PCI apertur

Re: Re: Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-12-18 Thread ASIF IQBAL
  On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 Marc Aurele La France wrote : >On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: >As root, please do (_exactly_ as shown) ... > >      mmapw -b /dev/fbs/aperture 0x01FE01002864 0x7C      mmapr /dev/fbs/aperture 0x01FE0101 4 > /dev/null > >... and tell me if the s

Re: Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-12-17 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Mon, 13 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: As root, please do (_exactly_ as shown) ... mmapw -b /dev/fbs/aperture 0x01FE01002864 0x7C mmapr /dev/fbs/aperture 0x01FE0101 4 > /dev/null ... and tell me if the second command (the `mmapr`) still crashes your system. The `mmapw` is very important h

Re: Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-12-13 Thread ASIF IQBAL
  On Sun, 12 Dec 2004 Marc Aurele La France wrote : >On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: >Excellent.  This seems to be implying that the bus scan is crashing the system when it gets around to probing what's behind your PCI bridge.  To confirm this, the command ... > >      mmapr /dev

Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-12-12 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: Excellent. This seems to be implying that the bus scan is crashing the system when it gets around to probing what's behind your PCI bridge. To confirm this, the command ... mmapr /dev/fbs/aperture 0x01FE0101 4 > /dev/null ... (as root) should consis

Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-12-10 Thread ASIF IQBAL
  On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 Marc Aurele La France wrote : >On Thu, 9 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: >>On Thu, 09 Dec 2004 Marc Aurele La France wrote : >>>On Wed, 8 Dec 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: Some more inputs I gathered on the scanpci issue are as follows: 1) scanpci () crashing is not consiste

Re: Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-11-28 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: If /dev/fbs/aperture still does not exist on your system, then either you did not do a reconfigure boot (a simple reboot won't suffice), or it failed for some reason. After installing the aperture driver I performed "touch /reconfigure" followed by a "init

Re: Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-11-27 Thread ASIF IQBAL
Hi Marc >If /dev/fbs/aperture still does not exist on your system, then >either you did not do a reconfigure boot (a simple reboot won't >suffice), or it failed for some reason. After installing the aperture driver I performed "touch /reconfigure" followed by a "init 6" as specified in README.

Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-11-27 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Sat, 27 Nov 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 Marc Aurele La France wrote : On Fri, 26 Nov 2004, ASIF IQBAL wrote: i am trying to bring up XFree86-4.4.0 on solaris-8/SPARC. I have built the XFree86 source on solaris 8/SPARC, during which i have done the following. 1. Edited #defi

Re: Re: [XFree86] XFree86-4.4.0 Build On Solaris-8/SPARC [Configuration Problem]

2004-11-27 Thread ASIF IQBAL
  Hi Marc Thanks for your valuable information. I am able to install the aperture driver according to README under aperture/README. The driver compiled for 64 bit and there was no issue with adding the driver. I have confirmed the driver installation with modinfo | grep aperture. But after this s