Sorry to chime in so late on this, but I don't think
HB_LEGACY_LEVEL
is good terminology.
Two years from now what we do today
will be Legacy, and the reference becomes ambiguous.
Is there any reason it cannot instead refer to the last PCODE
version that was parallel to the change in item structu
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 16:04:54 +0100
Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's a little dangerous to use hard coded size of HB_ITEM
It's not a little, but VERY dangerous but written especially for 8 byte
alignment ;-)
BTW, many times ago it was said that an alignment of 4 is
Andi,
>> [learning mode]
>> What is the advantage of doing it like this? Besides a smaller c file?
>> [/learning mode]
>
> [simple answer]
> Conserve CPU job. Only ONE time static is declared.
> Imagine if we have a PRG with 25 sub-functions and each SAME var has to
> be declared in each of it, it
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Miguel Angel Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Xharbour-Developers List"
Data invio: sabato 29 novembre 2008 15.57
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] 2008-11-29 12:10 UTC+0100 Miguel
AngelMarchuet <[EMAIL PROTECT
I think it's a little dangerous to use hard coded size of HB_ITEM
#ifndef __GNUC__
_asm {
mov edi, pDest;
mov esi, pSource;
mov ecx, 6; /* sizeof( HB_ITEM ) = 24 bytes / 4 = 6 */
rep movsd;
}
#else
memcpy( pDest, pSource, sizeof( HB_ITEM ) );
#endif
is possible i
if you want to use older versions of 3rd party libreries you need to add
HB_LEGACY_LEVEL
remove HB_NO_PROFILER make xharbour a lot of slow.
better if you add two macros for release programs.
Best regards,
Miguel Angel Marchuet
Enrico Maria Giordano escribió:
>
> -Messaggio Originale- D
Luiz,
I'm go back to Debian Etch, not Lenny. I have added "filebuf.c" on
source/rtl/Makefile.
Now after ./make_deb.sh it doesn't compiled bin packges at all, so I done
./make_tgz.sh and compile all, but after run xhbmk test.prg i got:
/usr/lib/xharbour/libxharbour.so: undefined reference to 'H
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Andi Jahja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Xharbour-Developers"
Data invio: sabato 29 novembre 2008 12.19
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] C Compiler for Windows, a simple revi
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Miguel Angel Marchuet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Xharbour-Developers List"
Data invio: sabato 29 novembre 2008 12.12
Oggetto: [xHarbour-developers] 2008-11-29 12:10 UTC+0100 Miguel
AngelMarchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 2008-11-29 12:10 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marc
2008-11-29 13:00 UTC+0100 Enrico Maria Giordano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* contrib\gtwvg\gtwvg.c
* changed return type to const char * in function hb_gt_wvt_Version()
* changed parameters type to const char * in function
hb_gt_wvt_SetDispCP()
* changed parameters type to const char * in
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 11:43:02 +0100
"Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. Can you report the result here, please?
If you are interested, why don't you try and see the results with your
very own eyes :-)
But please take note, that it contains asm codes, so BCC without T
On Sat, 29 Nov 2008 08:13:23 +0100
"Patrick Mast, xHarbour." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [learning mode]
> What is the advantage of doing it like this? Besides a smaller c file?
> [/learning mode]
[simple answer]
Conserve CPU job. Only ONE time static is declared.
Imagine if we have a PRG with 2
2008-11-29 12:10 UTC+0100 Miguel Angel Marchuet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* include\classes.h
* include\hbvmpub.h
* to use old 3rd party libs, is needed to build xharbour with macro
HB_LEGACY_LEVEL,
because profiler structural variables are eliminated from its
structure when are
n
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Patrick Mast, xHarbour." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "xHarbour-Developers"
Data invio: sabato 29 novembre 2008 8.16
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Next release version number.
> Hello,
>
> Ok, seems like we have an agreement to release 1.2.0.
>
> First thing w
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Andi Jahja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Xharbour-Developers"
Data invio: venerdì 28 novembre 2008 23.17
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] C Compiler for Windows, a simple review
> Hi Toninho,
>
> In my test, MSVC9 is a
-Messaggio Originale-
Da: "Andi Jahja" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A: "Enrico Maria Giordano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Xharbour-Developers"
Data invio: sabato 29 novembre 2008 0.10
Oggetto: Re: [xHarbour-developers] Warnings
> :-)
> Sorry, it should be OK now.
Perfect! Thank you.
EMG
--
EMA
16 matches
Mail list logo
