a reservation of 260 or
4096, but must make reservations for each event, as
the length can be calculated.
Best regards
Miguel Angel Marchuet
__ Información de ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versión de la base de firmas de
virus 4015 (20090417) __
ESET NOD32 Antivirus ha comprobado este
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Miguel Angel Marchuet
miguelan...@marchuet.net wrote:
#ifdef MAX_PATH
#define HB_MAX_PATH (MAX_PATH + 4)
#else
#define HB_MAX_PATH 264
#endif
Would be more appropriate, and if not then if there MAX_PATH porn hardcoded
to 264.
Nope. We need a
Warning W8080 source\rdd\wafunc.c 498: 'pDyn' is declared but never used in
function hb_rddSelectWorkAreaSymbol
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page: http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
The Best of Spectrum Games:
2009-04-17 08:54 UTC-0430 Ron Pinkas ron.pinkas/at/xharbour.com
* bin\pack_bin.bat
+ Added missing hbrun.exe and xbscript.exe
* bin\pack_src.bat
+ Added missing makefiles and pcre files
* include\hbclass.ch
! Fixed typo (duplicate Self declaration in EXTEND [TYPE] rule
*
Any volunteer to forward fixes to the xharbour-1-2-1 branch?
Anyone knows how to handle branches?
Ron
--
From: Ron Pinkas ron.pin...@xharbour.com
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2009 6:30 AM
To: xharbour-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject:
2009-04-17 16:32 UTC+0200 Enrico Maria Giordano
e.m.giord...@emagsoftware.it
* source\rdd\wafunc.c
- Commented out unused variable pDyn in function
hb_rddSelectWorkAreaSymbol()
EMG
--
EMAG Software Homepage: http://www.emagsoftware.it
The EMG's ZX-Spectrum Page:
Jose F. Gimenez wrote:
BTW, I sent you a private msg some time ago, about reconfiguring this
mailing list to avoid using reply to all every time. If you want I can
tell you how to do it.
+1
That would be great. It's very easy to hit Reply and then realizing
your reply
never made it to
Ron,
If nobody do it now, I'll can do it this evening, in a few hours. Now I
have
to go out.
Well, I'm here again, and ready to go ;-)
What changes have to be forward to 1.2.1?
Or it should be all changes?
If so, it's perhaps better to release them as 1.3.0
I did reply to your email, but
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 11:05 PM, Jose F. Gimenez jfgime...@wanadoo.es wrote:
What changes have to be forward to 1.2.1?
Or it should be all changes?
If so, it's perhaps better to release them as 1.3.0
AFAICT all changes need to go into release, and as they are mostly
bugfixes, and not
9 matches
Mail list logo
