* contrib/gtwvw/gtwvw.c
! fixed call to HB_TRACE() macro in hb_gt_FuncInit function. was
passing an diferent name of parameter found when compiling with
-DHB_TR_LEVEL=HB_TR_DEBUG
* source/rdd/dbf1.c
* source/rdd/dbf1net.c
! fixed call to HB_TRACE() macro in hb_dbfTableTransact
Thank you Luiz! 😀
Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik wrote:
Patrick
Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone
Regards
Luiz
Em 10 de out de 2016 11:27, "Patrick Mast" < patrick.m...@xharbour.com
[patrick.m...@xharbour.com] > escreveu:
Hey Luiz,I can revert the
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix
Thanks!
But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-)
What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the
change?
Patrick-
Il 10/10/2016 16:23, Rafael Culik ha scritto:
> Patrick
>
> I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix
Great! Looks as the best solution.
EMG
--
http://www.emagsoftware.it
http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic
http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum
http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg
-
Luiz,
Thanks for considering. What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted?
Can you explain the change?
Patrick
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Rafael Culik wrote:
Patrick i can keep the fix for init on new gcc and revert to not need pcode
change
Regards
Luiz
Em 10 de out de 2016 0
Hey Luiz,
If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the
changes.
It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right?
PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND
3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoi
6 matches
Mail list logo