Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-13 Thread Patrick Mast
All compiles OK now with latest xHarbour sources. Thank you Luiz! 😀 Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:40 PM, Patrick Mast wrote: Thank you Luiz! 😀 Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone Regards Luiz Em 10 d

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Thank you Luiz! 😀 Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick Ok. Ill commit tonight. Sorry for few words. New phone Regards Luiz Em 10 de out de 2016 11:27, "Patrick Mast" < patrick.m...@xharbour.com [patrick.m...@xharbour.com] > escreveu: Hey Luiz,I can revert the

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Hey Luiz,I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Thanks! But, please, try to reply in more than just two words ;-) What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change? Patrick-

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 10/10/2016 16:23, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Patrick > > I can revert the new parameter and still has the fix Great! Looks as the best solution. EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg -

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Luiz, Thanks for considering. What is it exactly you changed? What will be reverted? Can you explain the change? Patrick On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Rafael Culik wrote: Patrick i can keep the fix for init on new gcc and revert to not need pcode change Regards Luiz Em 10 de out de 2016 0

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-10 Thread Patrick Mast
Hey Luiz, If the changes are necessary or make xHarbour better, than we should keep the changes. It seems these changes need an increase of PCode level, right? PCode increase is a serious matter in my opinion. All PRG’s in user’s code AND 3rd party products need to be recompiled. *IF* we can avoi

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 09/10/2016 20:20, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Patrick, Enrico > > Revert or keep changes? I don't know. If they are absolutely necessary then keep them, otherwise revert them. EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://w

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 09/10/2016 17:43, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Patrick > > Not need recompile ill revert changes today Thank you, Luiz! EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Patrick Mast
All PRG's need to be recompiled. Patrick On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 12:25 PM, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: Il 09/10/2016 03:02, Andi Jahja ha scritto: > Do not know what happen. But clean builds solve this issue. Clean builds of what? EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Patrick Mast
Hello Entico, Yes, you are correct. Patrick On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 1:27 PM, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: Il 09/10/2016 13:17, Patrick Mast ha scritto: > All PRG's need to be recompiled. PCODE version is not changed from build 20160815. I suspect a bug somewhere. Anyway, a change of PCODE v

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 09/10/2016 13:17, Patrick Mast ha scritto: > All PRG's need to be recompiled. PCODE version is not changed from build 20160815. I suspect a bug somewhere. Anyway, a change of PCODE version *must* be officially announced. EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusi

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 09/10/2016 03:02, Andi Jahja ha scritto: > Do not know what happen. But clean builds solve this issue. Clean builds of what? EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg -

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 09/10/2016 02:36, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Enrico > > Fix is on the oven. will commit tomorrow So, FWH doesn't need to be recompiled? EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg --

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Il 09/10/2016 02:05, Rafael Culik ha scritto: > Fwh need recompile Ok, thank you. EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectrum http://www.emagsoftware.it/tbosg ---

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-09 Thread Patrick Mast
Hey Enrico, I get the same error building xBuild. Should PCode be increased? Patrick On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 00:11, Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: Using the latest xHarbour from SVN, any FWH program crashes with a message Module: 'blabla' was compiled into PCODE version: 0,this version of xHarbo

Re: [xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-08 Thread Andi Jahja
Do not know what happen. But clean builds solve this issue. Andi On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 00:11:44 +0200 Enrico Maria Giordano wrote: > Using the latest xHarbour from SVN, any FWH program crashes with a message > > Module: 'blabla' was compiled into PCODE version: 0,this version of > xHarbour expec

[xHarbour-developers] PCODE version 10?

2016-10-08 Thread Enrico Maria Giordano
Using the latest xHarbour from SVN, any FWH program crashes with a message Module: 'blabla' was compiled into PCODE version: 0,this version of xHarbour expects version: 10 What's happening? EMG -- http://www.emagsoftware.it http://www.emagsoftware.it/emgmusic http://www.emagsoftware.it/spectru