Hi Przemek,
Thank you for all your kind advices. It's quite a "big job", IMO :).
I'll do it carefuly and will refer to you if I find any problem.
Thanks again.
Andi
On Sun, 6 Mar 2011 14:30:22 +0100
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote:
> If you are really interested then I suggest to read
> "DATETIME/TIM
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011, Andi Jahja wrote:
Hi Andi,
> I proposed that Valtype( dDateTime ) returns "T" (currently "D")
> ( dDateTime = date data type where time != 0 ), thus the corresponding
> data type would be HB_IT_DATETIME instead of HB_IT_DATE | HB_IT_DATETIME.
> Any objection or is there any p
Hey Andi,
> I proposed that Valtype( dDateTime ) returns "T" (currently "D")
> ( dDateTime = date data type where time != 0 ), thus the corresponding
> data type would be HB_IT_DATETIME instead of HB_IT_DATE | HB_IT_DATETIME.
Correct. Seems logical to me.
Patrick
---
Andi
I see no problem with this changes
Regards
Luiz
-Mensagem Original-
From: Andi Jahja
Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2011 2:49 AM
To: Xharbour-Developers List
Subject: [xHarbour-developers] VALTYPE( dDATETIME )
Hi,
I proposed that Valtype( dDateTime ) returns "T" (cu
Hi,
I proposed that Valtype( dDateTime ) returns "T" (currently "D")
( dDateTime = date data type where time != 0 ), thus the corresponding
data type would be HB_IT_DATETIME instead of HB_IT_DATE | HB_IT_DATETIME.
Any objection or is there any problem foreseeable by this change?
Andi
-
5 matches
Mail list logo