On Nov 16, 2007 2:00 PM, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> > I haven't started yet, been dealing with house stuff and moving. Other
> > then that getting settle into the new job and unpacking. If you have
> > time go ahead and start.
ov 12, 2007 11:26 AM, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> > Sorry life's been a tad hectic lately and I haven't had a chance to look
> > at it yet. Its still on my TODO list although!
>
> Todd,
>
> How are you doing? Hope life&
Sorry life's been a tad hectic lately and I haven't had a chance to look at
it yet. Its still on my TODO list although!
Todd
On 9/26/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> > If no one has started on this I will start looking at the
If no one has started on this I will start looking at the latest XMLRPC
later this week and will work on integrating it in.
Todd
On 8/29/07, Natalia Shilenkova <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 8/29/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Natalia Shilenkova wrote:
> > > Not
> > > sure
+1
Her latest work has been great and plentifully!
Todd
On 6/7/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> I saw a constant flux of patches from Natalia lately, and I think she
> would make an excellent XIndice committer, not to mention how that
> would offload p
+1
Todd
On 5/11/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
> As far as I know you can set source level to 1.5 and still compile for
> 1.4 JVMs.
I don't think it works this way?
Gmail - [VOTE] Minimum Java
Version
compile.javac.target=1.4
compile
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
> Why not 1.5?
>
> 1.5 feature set is immense.
>
> Any compiling reason not to move to at least that?
I know I need Java 1.4 features immediately, so I want to make this switch
right
now for Xindice 1.2.
Personally I'd like
Why not 1.5?
1.5 feature set is immense.
Any compiling reason not to move to at least that?
Todd
On 5/10/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All,
I propose to set minimum required Java version for Xindice 1.2 and up to
Java
1.4 because:
* 1.3 is already past EOL
* 1.3 has
+1
Todd
On 5/2/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All,
Time has come to vote for the release of Xindice 1.1. Release files are
built
from XINDICE_1_1 tag, signed and uploaded to:
http://people.apache.org/~vgritsenko/xindice/builds/
Please vote. My vote is +1.
Vadim
Random question,
XUpdate project is dead as a whole, I tried submitting some patches but that
was a year ago with no answer. Can we legally have our own branch that we
maintain in our repository? If we could I will find my patches and take
responsibility for the code.
Todd
That sounds good, then we can get the plan for the next release going. :)
Todd
On 4/19/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
> On 4/5/07, *Vadim Gritsenko* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
...
> Once this is re
Author: byrne
Date: Tue Apr 17 23:42:33 2007
New Revision: 529889
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=529889
Log:
Fixed up xindice.bat to use the new lib locations.
Added xindice_rebuild.bat. Use -backup to have the script backup the database
files before running the utility.
Author: byrne
Date: Thu Apr 5 22:33:50 2007
New Revision: 526062
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=526062
Log:
Changed HashCode in both Key.java and Value.java to be modeled after the
String.hashCode().
Added test cases for both methods in their respective test cla
On 4/5/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
> Todd Byrne wrote:
> > So whats the big plan? Where do we want to head from here?
>
> I meant to tell you earlier but forgot... I tried to come up with
some
> realistic plan
Author: byrne
Date: Wed Apr 4 23:00:02 2007
New Revision: 525711
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=525711
Log:
Added two new build.properties:
compile.javac.target=1.3
compile.javac.source=1.3
Will allow us to build binary distributions for Java 1.3.
Signed up to tackle chan
Todd Byrne wrote:
> So whats the big plan? Where do we want to head from here?
I meant to tell you earlier but forgot... I tried to come up with some
realistic
plan for 1.1 and 1.2 releases -- checked in here:
I really think we should push 1.1 release ASAP, I have been using trunk code
Sounds good.
Todd
On 3/7/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
> Shouldn't we go for broke and move to 1.5 ? 1.5 has a bunch of language
> features that very nice, and has been out sense 2004-09-29
That is tempting... :)
But release 1.1 must hap
Shouldn't we go for broke and move to 1.5 ? 1.5 has a bunch of language
features that very nice, and has been out sense 2004-09-29
Todd
On 3/6/07, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Georg Sauer-Limbach wrote:
>
>>> Speaking of next version... Are there any plans for new release?...
>>
I don't have anything outstanding.
Todd
On Thu, 22 Feb 2007, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Xindice is still using older version of license headers, the correct version
> can
> be found here [1]. I'll try to update headers sometime this week (end), which
> means I'll be touching lots
Author: byrne
Date: Fri Nov 10 17:10:00 2006
New Revision: 473609
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473609
Log:
Added bug fix 40931 to release notes. Added my email to the developer list.
Todd Byrne
Modified:
xml/xindice/trunk/status.xml
Modified: xml/xindice/trunk/status
Author: byrne
Date: Fri Nov 10 16:58:03 2006
New Revision: 473607
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=473607
Log:
Added a new HelpCommand accessable through -h or --help.
Help menu no longer prints on errors. Removed some excess printStack statements
to help in debuging..
Pagec
I will take a look at all of the above and report back to you. I have
Friday off so should have some time to work on it this weekend.
Todd
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
Well this was an EOF exception so the database file was truncated, is
there an away to recover the non corrupted
Missread the diff. Thanks.ToddOn 10/26/06, Vadim Gritsenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:> In the DatabaseShudownHandler.run method the synchronized block needs to
> be outside the loop. Its possible for the Map to be modified by a> different thread and th
ckage org.apache.xindice.core;-import java.util.Hashtable;+import java.util.HashSet; import java.util.Iterator; import java.util.Map;+import java.util.Set;
/** * Going to handle the JVM Shutdown hook and insuring clean shutdown@@ -26,49 +27,57 @@ * * [EMAIL PROTECTED]">Todd Byrne
Try re-running ant from the xml-xindice-1.0 directory...But before you go any farther please download the 1.1b4 version at
http://xml.apache.org/xindice/download.cgi or best case check out the latest source from the repository. Todd ByrneOn 10/24/06, Thabo Lesofe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm u
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Todd Byrne wrote:
Anyone see a reason not to commit the DOM 3 patch
Yup, I do. This patch is not suitable for committing as-is, and looks
like some methods need more work.
I'll look into DOM3 issue.
I only gave it a once over just seeing if their was any int
Anyone see a reason not to commit the DOM 3 patch and look into rewriting the UglyBrowser to use something else besides Xerces?Any glaring issues with removing Xerces as a dependency?Todd Byrne
Author: byrne
Date: Wed May 17 12:16:29 2006
New Revision: 407356
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=407356&view=rev
Log:
Changes to include and automatic flush collections that have had document
changes. Its currently set to run every minute but can be adjusted or
later a confi
Gritsenko wrote:
> Todd Byrne wrote:
>
>> In getBTreeNode(long page, BTreeNode parent)(line ) if an exception gets
>> thrown for what ever reason it just gets ignored and null returned. This
>> seems problematic because nothing that calls this method checks for
>> null. Wo
e and gracefully skip the document.
Thoughts Ideas?
Todd Byrne
Author: byrne
Date: Thu Apr 6 13:59:14 2006
New Revision: 392071
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=392071&view=rev
Log:
Fixed a NPE in Tomcat 5.5 where path was equal to "".
Todd Byrne
Modified:
xml/xindice/trunk/java/src/org/apache/xindice/server/UglyBrowser.java
Author: byrne
Date: Wed Mar 29 08:58:09 2006
New Revision: 389834
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389834&view=rev
Log:
Added a more exact bugzilla link to xindice.
Todd
Modified:
xml/xindice/trunk/doap_Xindice.rdf
Modified: xml/xindice/trunk/doap_Xindice.rdf
URL:
Let me try it.
Todd
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> RDF document didn't parse. Removed the GET paramaters from the bug
>> database URL and fixed the problem.\nTodd Byrne
>>
>> -> rdf:resource="http://issues.apache.org
Author: byrne
Date: Mon Mar 27 09:50:59 2006
New Revision: 389209
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389209&view=rev
Log:
RDF document didn't parse. Removed the GET paramaters from the bug database URL
and fixed the problem.\nTodd Byrne
Modified:
xml/xindice/trunk/doap_Xi
Author: byrne
Date: Mon Mar 27 09:41:31 2006
New Revision: 389205
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=389205&view=rev
Log:
Adding xindice to http://project.apahce.org listing.
Initial checkin.
Todd Byrne
Added:
xml/xindice/trunk/doap_Xindice.rdf (with props)
Added: xml/xindice/t
Awesome,
Thanks all.
Todd
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 22, 2006, at 4:23 PM, Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
>>
>>> I'd like to propose Todd Byrne as new Xindice committer. He authored
>>> several patches and he
Thanks Vadim,
Work is slowing down now so I will have more time devote to this
project. There is lots of stuff to do so I am very excited about that.
Todd
+1 vote if I can do that :)
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose Todd Byrne as new Xindice committe
conversion with CVS repo lockdown.
Vadim
Todd Byrne wrote:
That an easy choice.
+1
Todd
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Hey,
Subj. Subversion is great, CVS not so. And we have to convert by end
of year anyways. Please vote for conversion.
+1
Vadim
That an easy choice.
+1
Todd
Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Hey,
Subj. Subversion is great, CVS not so. And we have to convert by end of
year anyways. Please vote for conversion.
+1
Vadim
Forgot the files. :(
Todd
Todd Byrne wrote:
I fixed up some issues with the way the Help menu was being printed. I
found that when a command didn't run for some reason that the helpful
stuff would get shoved off screen. I also refactored the printHelp out
of the XMLTools.java and crea
a
New class that extends Command and implements it execute method. Just
takes a command NodeList from the Hashtable and prints out the same help
menu.
Todd Byrne
Just fixing links to the Xindice bug database for the website and README
file in cvs.
Todd
Index: README
===
RCS file: /home/cvspublic/xml-xindice/README,v
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -r1.9 README
--- README 8 Feb 2004 01:07:57
Is this just a class path issue with GUMP? or a Java version problem.
Looks like the org/xml/sax/ext/Attributes2 interface is java 1.5 only.
Todd
Sam Ruby wrote:
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http:
I made the changes to the XUpdateImpl.java.patch that where requested. I
used cvs diff -u this time to create the diff its easier then having two
source trees and doing manual diffs. Let me know of that works.
I fixed up the XUpdateQueryTest to include an append test case to
specifically check
documents in the collection before committing
the changes back. This could be potentially hard on memory but it
guarantees that if the one of the commands blew up it doesn't leave the
database in a bad state.
Comments and suggestions welcome.
Todd Byrne
--- xml-xindice/java/src/org/apache/xi
in diff -u format.
Sincerely,
Todd Byrne
--- XUpdateImpl.java2004-08-03 10:37:45.0 -0600
+++
/home/byrne/jbproject/xindice-cvs-src/xml-xindice/java/src/org/apache/xindice/core/xupdate/XUpdateImpl.java
2004-08-03 10:39:03.0 -0600
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
import
When I run a a xupdate on a document with multiple appends like so:
http://www.xmldb.org/xupdate";>
File modified on:Tue Jul 27 12:43:23 MDT 2004 By
byrne
On a XML document that looks like this:
BBT_0_1
I get this result:
47 matches
Mail list logo
