RE: Some delving into XML-RPC

2002-02-19 Thread James Bates
> > I'm in the process of trying out Apache XML-RPC's behaviour > on the strings issue. I'll get back when I have some definite results. > > James > And the answer is: it's no better than CORBA: Java strings containing characters other than those present in Java's now infamous "default charac

RE: Some delving into XML-RPC

2002-02-19 Thread James Bates
> -Original Message- > From: Kimbro Staken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 February 2002 12:49 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Some delving into XML-RPC > > > > On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 04:35 AM, Kimbro Staken wrote: > > > &

Re: Some delving into XML-RPC

2002-02-19 Thread Kimbro Staken
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 04:35 AM, Kimbro Staken wrote: SOAP should have the same issue, as should any solution that is used from non-unicode languages. I'm sure the CORBA impls for something like PHP would have the same problem (I'm assuming PHP still doesn't support unicode but I real

Re: Some delving into XML-RPC

2002-02-19 Thread Kimbro Staken
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 03:00 AM, James Bates wrote: As you guys probably know, I'm really trying to get full Unicode support for documents in Xindice, and one of the reasons for switching to XML-RPC or SOAP or whatever is to get around some issues with CORBA on this front. Now readin

Some delving into XML-RPC

2002-02-19 Thread James Bates
> -Original Message- > From: Kurt Ward [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 19 February 2002 00:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Switch to XML-RPC / SOAP > > > > > Unless I'm overlooking something, I think SOAP is a > little overkill for > > > Xindice > > > since the data return