Hi,
1) We spent a lot of time for writing the custom mapper RDBMS<->XML as
all open source XMLDB which are on the market did not match our criteria.
2) No we did not try Xindice's XML_RPC interface.
Ed.
Kanarinka wrote:
Hi Edward,
I'm sorry to hear that. Could I bother you with two quick questio
Hi Edward,
I'm sorry to hear that. Could I bother you with two quick questions?
1) What did you switch to instead of Xindice?
2) Did you try Xindice's XML-RPC Interface? According to Walt Meyer this
seemed to solve some memory and resource issues on Windows --
http://www.thatwaltguy.com/xinstall
this was discussed recently on the mailing list -
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=xindice-users&m=102521421825423&w=2
Amol.
On Sun, Jul 07, 2002 at 08:32:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Although I successfully created the XMLObject hello under the collection
> /db/addressbook,
> since I
Monday, July 08, 2002, 16:03:18, Erick Brière <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem is (for me) Java: does some body has a simple example for
> doing that ? ("that" = get result of an xpath query, keep only required nodes,
> dropping children).
Not the full example, but the Xindice documentatio
Title: Re: Retieving parts of documents using XPath on a collection
Erick,
here is a Java example:
XPathQueryService service = ...;
String xpath = ...;
ResourceSet resultSet = service.query(xpath);
ResourceIterator results = resultSet.getIterator();
while (results.hasMoreResources()) {
Reso
Shouldn't it be:
xindice xpath -c /db/klemens -q "/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'120320']"
xpath not xpath_query...
Mark
"Dr. Klemens Waldhör" wrote:
> I tried this too. The answer I get is:
>
> c:\Programme\xml-xindice-1.0>xindice xpath_query -c /db/klemens -q
> "/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'120320']"
> Results in
Using XMLObjects seems to be the best, at least for performance point of
vue.
The problem is (for me) Java: does some body has a simple example for doing
that ?
("that" = get result of an xpath query, keep only required nodes, dropping
children).
Thanks,
Erick.
Ciprian Popovici wrote:
Fr
Saturday, July 06, 2002, 11:38:30, Erhan Baz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> faced with the same problem and wrote an application which takes the
> all document as DOM and eliminates unwanted branches.
The trouble with these solutions is that Xindice still does the same
amount of work. Performance-wi
I tried this too. The answer I get is:
c:\Programme\xml-xindice-1.0>xindice xpath_query -c /db/klemens -q
"/[EMAIL PROTECTED]'120320']"
Results in:
"='120320']""==""" ist syntaktisch an dieser Stelle nicht verarbeitbar.
Which literally translated means: "='120320']""==""" cannot be treated
(?) s
