[xmail] Re: Looking for Win32 webmail interface for xmail

2002-06-11 Thread Jonas Hummelstrand
2002-06-11, 03:05 Bill Healy wrote : BH Has anyone found a webmail program that allows reading/sending/deleting BH and getting/sending attachments that runs on IIS? Works great for me: http://www.altair2000.net/en/software/software.asp?codename=xmail-wai Jonas Hummelstrand [EMAIL

[xmail] message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Roman Dusek
Hi, I need to setup mailbox that gets all the emails for the domain - i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] I use one account, let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED] and in aliases.tab I have: domain.com[TAB]*[TAB]mailbox The problem is that if e-mail is sent to let's say [EMAIL PROTECTED], there is no header

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
Set up a single mailbox and assign the * alias to that mailbox. That should direct all mail into that single mailbox - and the original recipient address will remain in place (I have a similar setup, and I use my mail client to sort based on the original recipient address). At 14:47 6/11/2002

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
Sorry, I notice that what you describe and what I describe are essentially the same. I plead not being awake yet...:) However, I don't see why you are having the problem with that setup, unless it's related to how your client mail server is retrieving the mail. As I indicated, the headers on

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Roman Dusek
I am getting quite the same headers - recepient's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is only deep inside Received:... header and in To: header that can be hidden using Bcc. So where should the client mailserver get the right address from? Roman At 08:59 11.6. 2002 -0400, you wrote: Sorry, I notice

[xmail] mx records with 127.0.0.1

2002-06-11 Thread Sönke Ruempler
hi davide, there are some mx records that point to 127.0.0.1 (stupid, but i have noticed one today). so if xmail trys to send an email to the server, it sends the mail to itsself and produces a mail loop. it's not an xmail bug, but xmail could check for those stupid mx records. here the one i

[xmail] Re: message headers when using aliases

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 15:03 6/11/2002 +0200, Roman Dusek wrote: I am getting quite the same headers - recepient's address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) is only deep inside Received:... header and in To: header that can be hidden using Bcc. So where should the client mailserver get the right address from? Very right you

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Juan H. Medina
Hi ... How i can know what is goin on.. i have again the same problem with 1.9-pre2 11:52am up 3 days, 13:53, 5 users, load average: 3.22, 3.11, 2.66 62 processes: 58 sleeping, 4 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped CPU0 states: 71.0% user, 2.1% system, 0.0% nice, 26.2% idle CPU1 states:

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Juan H. Medina
Thank you for the quicky answer No i see the lines normal 2002-06-11 12:30:08 2002-06-11 12:30:17 2002-06-11 12:30:17 2002-06-11 12:30:17 2002-06-11 12:33:22 2002-06-11 12:33:35 2002-06-11 12:33:42 2002-06-11 12:34:17 and i still have the following process: PID USER PRI NI SIZE

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Juan H. Medina
Here is: PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND 18849 root 14 0 5152 5152 1164 R99.9 1.0 0:30 XMail 18854 root 9 0 5152 5152 1164 S87.0 1.0 0:18 XMail 18847 root 19 0 5152 5152 1164 R51.0 1.0 0:19 XMail 18850

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Tracy
At 13:52 6/11/2002 -0500, Juan H. Medina wrote: /var/MailRoot/bin/18849: No such file or directory. Looks like you're missing a space between your XMail Bin folder and the PID - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Juan H. Medina
No, here is again: Before: 19494 root 17 0 7160 7160 1176 R99.9 1.3 12:23 XMail 19499 root 19 0 7160 7160 1176 R99.9 1.3 11:32 XMail 19508 root 15 0 7160 7160 1176 R99.9 1.3 9:11 XMail [root@mail bin]# gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail 19494 GNU

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Juan H. Medina
This is the idea right: CFLAGS = -g -I. -D__LINUX__ -DXMAIL_X86 -D_REENTRANT=1 -D_THREAD_SAFE=1 and put comment (#) in the strip lines .. right the make clean make and install the executables right then put gdb /var/MailRoot/bin/XMail (PID) -Mensaje original- De: [EMAIL

[xmail] Re: To many load (AGAIN, with 1.9)

2002-06-11 Thread Juan H. Medina
Hi,,, i got this: [New Thread 29726 (LWP 27832)] Delayed SIGSTOP caught for LWP 27832. POP3 client exit [200.57.4.138] LWP 27831 exited. POP3 client connection from [192.168.135.37] [New Thread 30751 (LWP 27833)] Delayed SIGSTOP caught for LWP 27833. POP3 client exit [192.168.135.37] LWP

[xmail] Logwatch

2002-06-11 Thread Webmaster 9euro
Hi all, first of all I must tell that I'm a newbie with Linux :( I configured the server to use Xmail's sendmail instead of the default one, but I can't get the Logwatch reports. Should I manually configure all the default root aliases that RedHat uses to send reports? I only created

[xmail] Re: update 100% cpu

2002-06-11 Thread Michal Altair Valasek
| As I come to think about it, because each user is able to configer a | redirect (through WAI), someone can simply sabotage the whole | mailserver system, simply by the click of one button... You may disable the redirect and lredirect command to be used by WAI users, but I don't think that

[xmail] Re: update 100% cpu

2002-06-11 Thread Michal Altair Valasek
| It's already fixed from the XMail side. If you want i can send you the | snapshot to test. But the problem of creating loops from the | UI remain ... And how it may be solved? I can write some code to check if the redirect is not the same as user's e-mail address or it's aliases or it's

[xmail] Backup Xmail servers

2002-06-11 Thread Quost Support
Hi All, We have Xmail on our 'primary' mail server (W2k), which manages the bulk of the email. However, we also need a 'secondary' or 'backup' mail server. When we installed Xmail on our RH Linux server, we noticed that the folder structure (in the users mailbox) was different - so we gave

[xmail] Re: Backup Xmail servers

2002-06-11 Thread Bill Healy
I think the recommended way is to setup a custom domain and then use the SMTP directive to cause it to deliver using DNS entries. Or use the SMTPRELAY with the IP of the primary server. Bill -- From: Quost Support[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2002 8:56 PM To: