> Yes. It is a valid mailbox.
http://www2.logwatch.org:81/tabs/docs/logwatch.8.html
--mailto address
Mail the results to the email address or user spec
ified in address.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to
I have noticed lately that filter script frezzes (xmail 1.17 and av
filter 1.7). So I need to restart xmail to unblock this.
Anyone with the same problem?
--Sasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: se
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
>>I have setup MAILTO variables for crontab to normal email address but I
>>can't receive Logwatch report because it still want to send it to
>>. I have tried to change it directly in the logwatch file but
>>looks like I don't know the right syntax for email. I have tried
> I have setup MAILTO variables for crontab to normal email address but I
> can't receive Logwatch report because it still want to send it to
> . I have tried to change it directly in the logwatch file but
> looks like I don't know the right syntax for email. I have tried like
> <[EMAIL PROTEC
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>
> > The DEFAULT_DOMAIN thingy is valid only for XMail's sendmail.
>
> Davide, i never got mails from you early in the germanies morning - are y=
ou
> coding 2.0 heheh?
Guys my network is currently a mess and I could be arrested if someo
Hello Davide,
Monday, September 29, 2003, 7:07:32 PM, you wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Henri van riel wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm trying to compile XMail 1.17 for my uClibc system but I get
>> compilation errors I have not been able to solve, could somebody point
>> me in the right direction?
> The DEFAULT_DOMAIN thingy is valid only for XMail's sendmail.
Davide, i never got mails from you early in the germanies morning - are you
coding 2.0 heheh?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send th
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
>>I have still problem with user without domain. I am using 1.17
>>under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
>>setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
>>root in this default domain.
>>Any idea?
>>
>>
>
>DEFAULT_D
> # cat $MAIL_ROOT/spool/?/?/slog/
humm now it works, stupid customers :-P
ignore that davide, was my failure
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message t
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:
>
>
>
>>I have still problem with user without domain. I am using 1.17
>>under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
>>setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
>>root in this d
> I have still problem with user without domain. I am using 1.17
> under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
> setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
> root in this default domain.
> Any idea?
DEFAULT_DOMAIN is for the sender and replace
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> I have still problem with user without domain. I am using 1.17
> under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
> setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
> root in this default domain.
> Any idea?
The
Hi!
I have still problem with user without domain. I am using 1.17
under linux RH8. It supposed to be solved but looks like not. I have
setup DEFAULT_DOMAIN in xmail's startup script and also a created user
root in this default domain.
Any idea?
Sasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send th
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>
> > Well, the RFC "suggest" to return an 552 error code in such case, and t=
his
> > is what XMail returns right now. It used to return a 4xx in the very
> > beginning but it has been changed. My initial though indeed had been th=
at
> >
> Well, the RFC "suggest" to return an 552 error code in such case, and this
> is what XMail returns right now. It used to return a 4xx in the very
> beginning but it has been changed. My initial though indeed had been that
> a full mailbox was a temporary condition.
mhm my internal XMail server
On Fri, 26 Sep 2003, Tracy wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I've been looking over the problem of RFC compliance for postmaster@,
> abuse@ and a couple of other aliases, and I'm wondering if there's an
> existing configuration option that can be used to allow mail - even from
> addresses in spammers.tab a
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Toby Reiter wrote:
>
> Ok,
> I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
> thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
>
> a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
> existing mail users from sending out me
Hi!
I just have noticed that nobody is looking the messages thru news
server. I have find one user to post directly but still didn't receive
any answer.
Does anyone check news server ?
Sasa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
I had a feeling that it was not debugged through valgrind. I will
suggest that we can go ahead with valgrinding xmail. The immediate
benefit I see is to have xmail flawless (If any exist there), as well as
there would be considerable increase in performance.
Regards,
Veeresh
Davide Libenzi wr
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Bill Healy wrote:
>
> It's a temporary error not a permanent error, the person at the other
> end might empty the mailbox at any time and then the message could go
> through.
Well, the RFC "suggest" to return an 552 error code in such case, and this
is what XMail returns rig
It's a temporary error not a permanent error, the person at the other
end might empty the mailbox at any time and then the message could go
through.
Bill
>--
>From: S=F6nke Ruempler[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 10:45 PM
>To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Sasa Stupar wrote:
> No it is not down. 8-)
I'm currently running with a crappy configuration to cope with the
registrar policy/dumbness.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
>
> No problem :) but you missed the point, why is XMail doing that for
> negative values? I would expect it to ignore anything except what in the
> docs, right?
XMail does bit-and the number to unmask certain bits, that's why this
result.
- Davide
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
>
>
>
>>Nick Marino wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Is the list down???
>>>
>>>
>>I guess not ;-)
>>
>>
>
>Yes, sadly it is. Hope today will come back, otherwise I'll change
>registrar.
>
>
>
>- Davide
>
>-
>To unsubscribe from
No problem :) but you missed the point, why is XMail doing that for
negative values? I would expect it to ignore anything except what in the
docs, right?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, September 29,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
>
> I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not notify
> anyone. Is that expected behavior?
So, here's the rule. Do not return neg values.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the
I have (on windows) and it seems XMail drops the message and does not notify
anyone. Is that expected behavior?
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davide Libenzi
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 1:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Veeresh Khanorkar wrote:
>
> Davide,
>
> Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
> similar, please do inform the same.
No I did not.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL P
Davide,
Have we tried to do valgrind on xmail? If you are using something
similar, please do inform the same.
Regards,
Veeresh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of
test
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 9/26/2003
Tested on: 9/29/2003 4:42:46 PM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTE
>
> > I have enabled POP logs. Is there any way to hide passwords in that log?
>
> What about setting the correct permissions to MAIL_ROOT ?
>
Setting correct permissions works fine for the case you think of.
I prefer not having cleartext passwords in log files because if I'm
debugging someone's
Ok,
I couldn't find anything exactly like this in the mail archive, so I
thought I'd put this out right here, in a list of questions:
a) Am I right in assuming that there are no special settings to allow
existing mail users from sending out messages using SMTP auth, as
long as their email clie
What changed?
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Kielkopf
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 2:43 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Xmail Administrator 0.24 released
A few updates to Xmail Administrator
see: http://www.webifi
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote:
>
> hi davide,
>
> once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to send =
a
> message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is tha=
t
> right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately bac
hi davide,
once again a bug or feature question. i noticed that xmail tries to send a
message again if the remote server gives the error 'Mailbox full'. Is that
right? I think XMail schon bounce that message immediately back to the
sender?!
--
Soenke.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Sat, 27 Sep 2003, Henri van riel wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to compile XMail 1.17 for my uClibc system but I get
> compilation errors I have not been able to solve, could somebody point
> me in the right direction? These are the errors I get:
>
>
>
> (everything fine so far, then:
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Shawn Anderson wrote:
>
> Davide,
>
> I am curious about something, what happens in I have a filter that returns
> error codes that are negative? For example -1 or -5?
I believe it depends on the OS. Try it ...
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "u
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Peter Lindeman wrote:
>
> Nick Marino wrote:
>
> > Is the list down???
>
> I guess not ;-)
Yes, sadly it is. Hope today will come back, otherwise I'll change
registrar.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message t
Nick Marino wrote:
> Is the list down???
I guess not ;-)
Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the list down???
---
avast! Antivirus: Outbound message clean.
Virus Database (VPS): 9/26/2003
Tested on: 9/29/2003 7:51:05 AM
avast! is copyright (c) 2000-2003 ALWIL Software.
http://www.avast.com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message
40 matches
Mail list logo
