thanks Tracy and Jeff
Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>
>
>
>>Okay, I figured it out. I had only allowed my IP address in
>>smtp.ipmap.tab and smtprelay.tab. I cleared these documents, and all is
>>well. What is the difference in the two? Also, why do my logs keep
>>saying
Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>Okay, I figured it out. I had only allowed my IP address in
>smtp.ipmap.tab and smtprelay.tab. I cleared these documents, and all is
>well. What is the difference in the two? Also, why do my logs keep
>saying xmailserver.test, when I deleted that domain?
>
>
Check
At 20:56 1/13/2004, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>by relay, do you mean open their client, set mail.mydomain.com as smtp
>and send messages?
Relaying mail means that a host can send mail through your server without
restriction.
If the host is a local host (ie. under your control), this may be a good
by relay, do you mean open their client, set mail.mydomain.com as smtp
and send messages?
Tracy wrote:
>smtp.ipmap.tab is the list of IP addresses allowed to connect to your SMTP
>server. Generally speaking, there should be at least one line in there:
>
>"0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "ALLOW" "
smtp.ipmap.tab is the list of IP addresses allowed to connect to your SMTP
server. Generally speaking, there should be at least one line in there:
"0.0.0.0" "0.0.0.0" "ALLOW" "1"
Unless, of course, you don't want to receive mail from the outside world.
smtprelay.tab is the list of
Okay, I figured it out. I had only allowed my IP address in
smtp.ipmap.tab and smtprelay.tab. I cleared these documents, and all is
well. What is the difference in the two? Also, why do my logs keep
saying xmailserver.test, when I deleted that domain?
Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Dustin C. Hatch
Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>What log will it show up in? POP3 shows when I log in and SMTP shows
>when I send, but which shows when I receive?
>
>
Your smtp log should show any activity by the XMail smtp server
including mail received from the outside, lmail shows local mail, and I
believe the s
What log will it show up in? POP3 shows when I log in and SMTP shows
when I send, but which shows when I receive?
Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>
>
>
>>Okay, am I dumb or what? I can't receive any messages!! I can send, and
>>pop3 logging says a logged in, but no messages get
Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
>Okay, am I dumb or what? I can't receive any messages!! I can send, and
>pop3 logging says a logged in, but no messages get to the server i
>guess. Whats up with that?
>
>What am I doing wrong?
>
>
>
Did you run XMail in debug mode? When you send mail to the local dom
Do your server a correct registration in DNS?
Correct MX record with high priority?
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
P=E5
vegne av Dustin C. Hatch
Sendt: 13. januar 2004 04:31
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: [xmail] POP3?
Okay, am I dumb or what? I ca
chabral wrote:
>Jeffrey Laramie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Would you by any chance have a link to this document? This is
>>something I really need to keep up on.
>>
>>
>
>Here you can find all rfcs:
>http://www.rfc-index.com/
>
>
>
Great, thanks. You've provided a valuabl
Jeffrey Laramie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Would you by any chance have a link to this document? This is
> something I really need to keep up on.
Here you can find all rfcs:
http://www.rfc-index.com/
regards,
chabral
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xm
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> Would you by any chance have a link to this document? This is something
> I really need to keep up on.
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=rfc2821&btnG=Google+Search
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "uns
chabral wrote:
>Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>Because RFC2822 specifies that A records for mail servers should not
>>be CNAMEs...:)
>>
>>
>
>You mean, rcf 2821.
>Here is an extract:
>"Once an SMTP client lexically identifies a domain to which mail will
> be delivered for
At 15:00 1/13/2004, chabral wrote:
>Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Because RFC2822 specifies that A records for mail servers should not
> > be CNAMEs...:)
>
> You mean, rcf 2821.
You're quite right. My mistake - the numbers are just too close together
for my big fingers...:)
-
To uns
Tracy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because RFC2822 specifies that A records for mail servers should not
> be CNAMEs...:)
You mean, rcf 2821.
Here is an extract:
"Once an SMTP client lexically identifies a domain to which mail will
be delivered for processing (as described in sections 3
At 11:07 1/13/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
> >True. However, most RDNS checks today are to determine that a mail server
> >(ie. a connecting IP address) *has* a PTR record, not to match the PTR
> >record with the HELO or MAIL FROM domain.
>
>Interesting. Does XMail compare domains or does it just c
Tracy wrote:
>At 10:38 1/13/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>
>
>>Right, but getting back to Dale's original concern, his virtual domains
>>won't fail the remote server's RDNS check if the DNS for his SMTP server
>>is configured correctly. And he shouldn't be afraid to use RDNS to check
>>the valid
Tracy wrote:
>At 10:38 1/13/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>
>
>>That's kinda interesting. You have multiple A records pointing to
>>66.219.172.36. We're getting a little OT here but why do you use A
>>records instead of CNAMEs? I know there was some debate about this years
>>ago and at that time
At 10:38 1/13/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Right, but getting back to Dale's original concern, his virtual domains
>won't fail the remote server's RDNS check if the DNS for his SMTP server
>is configured correctly. And he shouldn't be afraid to use RDNS to check
>the validity of a remote server. E
At 10:38 1/13/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>That's kinda interesting. You have multiple A records pointing to
>66.219.172.36. We're getting a little OT here but why do you use A
>records instead of CNAMEs? I know there was some debate about this years
>ago and at that time the conventional wisdom w
Tracy wrote:
>At 23:24 1/12/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>
>
>>Does your SMTP server identify itself as mail.vbot.org,
>>mail.aristiasoft.com, or karen.aristiasoft.com? Does it change depending
>>on who sends the mail? I'm pretty sure the server only identifies itself
>>by one name and that shou
At 23:24 1/12/2004, Jeffrey Laramie wrote:
>Does your SMTP server identify itself as mail.vbot.org,
>mail.aristiasoft.com, or karen.aristiasoft.com? Does it change depending
>on who sends the mail? I'm pretty sure the server only identifies itself
>by one name and that should be karen.aristiasoft.c
Fine. I experienced a similar thing on RH9 with my XQM Agent:=20
mem was exhausted and the application crashed when huge amounts of data =
were scanned ...=20
Switching back to the 2.4.1 thread scheme was the cure.
I think putting LD_ASSUME_KERNEL into your profile is a good idea.
--Harald
> --
Memory is ok :-)
Running normally around 66 Mo and without crash till yesterday...we
have to wait more to be sure about crash!
mardi 13 janvier 2004 at 08:48:16, you said :
Harald> Did you check mem usage now? Maybe this prob is also solved.
Harald> --Harald
>> -Urspr=FCngliche
Did you check mem usage now? Maybe this prob is also solved.
--Harald
> -Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-
> Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Im Auftrag von Pascal de R.
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 13. Januar 2004 08:38
> An: Davide Libenzi
> Betreff: [xmail] Re: AW: Re: AW: Re: XMa
mardi 13 janvier 2004 at 08:30:34, you said :
Davide> On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
>> XMail has running all night without crash
Davide> I lost the track. So, now you have RH9 + -static + LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, don't
Davide> you?
No I have :
Compil on RH9 without -static but with L
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Pascal de R. wrote:
> XMail has running all night without crash
I lost the track. So, now you have RH9 + -static + LD_ASSUME_KERNEL, don't
you?
> Davide; do you the coredump file of previous crash or can i
> destroy it ?
You can nuke it.
- Davide
-
To unsubscrib
28 matches
Mail list logo
