I have made a version of XAV with support for McAfee. In this version I
extract the virusname from the report file and put it in the log(you can
put the log file where you want).
The basic support for other scanners is available, but doesn't support
multithreading well.
It should not be a big jo
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Oh Davide, Davide...
>
> Tweaked SysDepLinux to log debug messages to real syslog.
>
> Please look at debug output (pre10) at:
>
> http://beaucox.com/xmaildebuglog.html
>
> Notice filter rc's of -5; that's when the troubles begin.
> I haven't looked th
I use the imap setup from SmartPost, But i use Squirrelmail (well modded
squirrelmail) for the web front end.
-- Chris L. Fanklin --
- Original Message -
From: "Michail Tchoudinov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 2:59 PM
Subject: [xmail] SV: Imap
The to: line was empty for me as well as the Subject and From lines,
although they do show up if i look at the message source. Outlook express
just didn't show them, shows all the headers as part of the body.
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Schwarz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PRO
Take a look here
www.smartpost.ro
SmartPost is an e-mail solution based on XMail and Courier IMAP
Mikhail
Smart post team leader
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] =
P=E5
vegne av [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 14. mars 2004 20:53
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne
On Sunday 14 March 2004 09:22 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> > > Goo
Hello,
can me recommend any imap and webmail for xmail on linux?
Thank you.
Eduxp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey there Davide,
I normally would not jump in with "me too" but I know your testing so
I'm just letting you know that mail containing no from or subject also
came to me.
--
Charlie Qualls
Property Director/IT Manager
Girl Scouts - Fox Valley Council
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sunday, March 14,
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Michael Schwarz wrote:
> Hi Davide
>
> Mail with empty from and subject from you.
> This mail arrived by my server with this header:
Yes, it is here. I'd be thinking it was due pre10 running, if the machine
didn't give me a weird /dev/hda message while rebooting. I am curre
Hi Davide
Mail with empty from and subject from you.
This mail arrived by my server with this header:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-AV-Scanned: yes 50ac1cf76871dafe67840163fa0a129b
Received: from x35.xmailserver.org (69.30.125.51:42126)
by blackhost.n
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
>
> > Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
> >
> > Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
> >
> > Will try to force a test as above.
> >
> > =46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that
Thank you.This is solution.
I have question.What I have to set that I want smtp relaing only after
SMTP AUTH.
If user will use HELO,so then will not want to send mails..
Thanx
Sunday, March 14, 2004, 7:49:57 PM, you wrote:
DL> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> sorry, I have wro
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> sorry, I have wrote here mail to: but I have thought mail from:
> Do u have any idea what should be wrong in my setting?
You need to bound the email address with <>
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail"
Hello Davide,
Sunday, March 14, 2004, 7:44:24 PM, you wrote:
DL> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I dont thing,after EHLO and smtp auth is everything ok. But if I am
>> trying through HELO and than MAIL TO: [EMAIL PROTECTED] where
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] is existing email account on
xmailserver.org
S10BF1B
MAIL FROM:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
RCPT TO:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 10:44:24 -0800 (PST)
From: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Davide Libenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [xmail] Re: smtp - local error in processing (-31)
Hello Davide,
Sunday, March 14, 2004, 7:37:58 PM, you wrote:
DL> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> where is problem?when I write "mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in
>> telnet, server response is "451 Requested action aborted: (-31) local
>> error in processing
>> I dont know what is
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> where is problem?when I write "mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in
> telnet, server response is "451 Requested action aborted: (-31) local
> error in processing
> I dont know what is wrong.
mail from:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe fr
hi,
where is problem?when I write "mail from: [EMAIL PROTECTED]" in
telnet, server response is "451 Requested action aborted: (-31) local
error in processing
I dont know what is wrong.
Thanx.
Eduxp
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [E
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
>
> Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
>
> Will try to force a test as above.
>
> =46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that the problem,
> once triggered, persists. All messages good unt
Beau E. Cox wrote:
>>Good Morning (it's early at GMT+10 ;) ),
>>
>>Just installed pre10 and am logging in debug mode.
>>
>>Will try to force a test as above.
>>
>>=46rom looking at overnight messages, it seems that the problem,
>>once triggered, persists. All messages good until about 3am local th
On Sunday 14 March 2004 07:41 am, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> On Sunday 14 March 2004 06:14 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> > X-Spam-Level:
> > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D0.0 required=3D5.0 tests=3Dnone autolearn=3Dno
> > version=3D2.63
> >
> > On Sun, 14 Mar 2004
On Sunday 14 March 2004 06:14 am, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> sin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3D0.0 required=3D5.0 tests=3Dnone autolearn=3Dno
> version=3D2.63
>
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> > Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > Are you guy
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>I cannot setup an extra test identical to what I am running very soon. I
>>will try pre 10 on my server and continue testing.
>
>
> It seems that the problem was triggered by SA. I had a filter yesterday
> that was simulating message change (rc 7), and it was working fi
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> > Are you guys able to replicate an off-line XMail setup identical to the
> > one you are using? To setup a trivial test suite that sends a burst of
> > messages to an account an cross-check them. Yesterday I was using this
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> Are you guys able to replicate an off-line XMail setup identical to the
> one you are using? To setup a trivial test suite that sends a burst of
> messages to an account an cross-check them. Yesterday I was using this to
> feed messages to my test XMail setup:
>
> http:
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> > Mind trying pre10?
> >
> > http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.18-pre10.tar.gz
> >
> > I would be really interested in seeing the return codes that XMail sees
> > from filters (Filter run: ...) ...
>
> Is this also usefull for the messages that see
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> I resend the message below to the list because I did not get it myself
> from the list. As I check my logs here it was sended. This is what is in
> the smail log file :
>
> "lindeman.nl" "1079275079528.3561499.server.lindeman.org" "S4358C"
> "[E
Original Message
From: "Davide Libenzi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2004 9:55 AM
Subject: [xmail] Re: Index Files
> On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Nick Marino wrote:
>
>> Where would I find a list of indexed files for xmail.
>
> Look for names inside the t
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>>This is strange, I didn't receive the original message of Beau here in
>>>the list. Is this because 1.18pre09 is running here or another problem?
>>
>>Boy, I don't know. I did one 'radical' change on Thur night:
>>upgraded my Linux kernel from 2.4.25 to 2.6.4. But my origi
On Sun, 14 Mar 2004, Nick Marino wrote:
> Where would I find a list of indexed files for xmail.
Look for names inside the tabindex directory.
> Also if I add a new entry to the smtp.ipprop.tab file does the server need
> to be restarted to pickup on that or does it read that file each time?
No
Where would I find a list of indexed files for xmail.
Also if I add a new entry to the smtp.ipprop.tab file does the server need
to be restarted to pickup on that or does it read that file each time?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [
I resend the message below to the list because I did not get it myself
from the list. As I check my logs here it was sended. This is what is in
the smail log file :
"lindeman.nl" "1079275079528.3561499.server.lindeman.org" "S4358C"
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" "SMTP"
"
On Sat, 13 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote:
> Hi -
>
> Davide, I'm still getting _some_ messages with part of
> the SpamAssassin header in my mail client - like the
> changed rc (7) is not being observed. It's about 1 out of
> 10 - I can't see a pattern. Running debugging, I see that
> sa_filter.pl i
Beau E. Cox wrote:
>> (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
>>X-Spam-Level:
>>X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
>>version=2.63
>>
>>Chris L. Franklin wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>>>It sounds more like a bad "line return" (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for
>>>more the messages header
On Sunday 14 March 2004 12:00 am, Peter Lindeman wrote:
> (2004-01-11) on cathy.beaucox.com
> X-Spam-Level:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no
> version=2.63
>
> Chris L. Franklin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > It sounds more like a bad "line return" (aka not a \r\n) on
Chris L. Franklin wrote:
> Hello,
> It sounds more like a bad "line return" (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for more
> the messages header lines.
> rather then xmail not observing the code return of 7.
This is strange, I didn't receive the original message of Beau here in
the list. Is this because 1.1
Hello,
It sounds more like a bad "line return" (aka not a \r\n) on 1 for more
the messages header lines.
rather then xmail not observing the code return of 7.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original Message -
From: "Beau E. Cox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: mlist.xmail
Sent: Sunday,
37 matches
Mail list logo
