[xmail] Re: sa_filter wish

2004-03-16 Thread Don Drake
Can this be done? Yes. However, I'm swamped at the moment, so I can't even provide an estimate on when I could start this. -Don > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sasa Stupar > Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:08 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)

2004-03-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >>Messages from the list which never have been delivered from > >>x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about > >>it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul > > > > > > I believ

[xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)

2004-03-16 Thread Peter Lindeman
Davide Libenzi wrote: >>Messages from the list which never have been delivered from >>x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about >>it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul > > > I believe it is ecartis. I have just found 3 ecartis processes stuck

[xmail] Re: LOGS

2004-03-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote: > > A cron script that does cleanups (read move and backup) should work just > > fine to keep the logs dir tidy. > > Yes, but what I want is for the logs to have allways the same name and > not name+date. I am administering my server thru Webmin and it ha

[xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)

2004-03-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Messages from the list which never have been delivered from > x35.xmailserver.org to my mailserver. You haven't seen my messages about > it, if so then probably more message are going to /dev/nul I believe it is ecartis. I have just found 3 ecartis p

[xmail] Re: LOGS

2004-03-16 Thread Michael Schwarz
> not name+date. I am administering my server thru Webmin and it has > option for system logs, so I am able to setup a log view but > it has to > have permanent name. > > Sasa Hi Sasa you can set it to something like this: /var/MailRoot/logs/smtp-* This shows all files that match in the ac

[xmail] Re: LOGS

2004-03-16 Thread Sasa Stupar
Davide Libenzi pravi: > On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote: > > >>Hi! >> >>Is there anyway to make logs to have only three logs from the >>past-something like for apache where you have access.log, access1.log, >>access2.log, access3.log and to rotate bettween them? >>Now the logs are not ov

[xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)

2004-03-16 Thread Peter Lindeman
Davide Libenzi schreef: >Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are >you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)? yes, SA ! >>> >>> >>>Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers. If noone are using >>>XMail on those system mayb

[xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)

2004-03-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > Davide - > > I have been running pre12 since last night, all rcs OK, looks > good now. Thx ! Keep me posted if something strange happen. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PR

[xmail] Re: LOGS

2004-03-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Tue, 16 Mar 2004, Sasa Stupar wrote: > Hi! > > Is there anyway to make logs to have only three logs from the > past-something like for apache where you have access.log, access1.log, > access2.log, access3.log and to rotate bettween them? > Now the logs are not overwriting the old ones and th

[xmail] Re: 1.18-pre09 problem(?)

2004-03-16 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Mon, 15 Mar 2004, Peter Lindeman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > > >>>Thx for testing it. It is running fine even on xmailserver.org. Are > >>>you running filters? Do they ever return 7 (message changed)? > >> > >>yes, SA ! > > > > > > Great thx! I am still missing BSD and Solaris testers.

[xmail] sa_filter wish

2004-03-16 Thread Sasa Stupar
Hi! Don, can you add in your script the following: when message passes SA it adds the headers X-Spam-Status and what I want is to extract from that header just info on "hits" and then based on the hits to manipulate files,ex.: from 0-5 deliver normaly, 5-10 send to postmaster for review, >10 de