[xmail] Re: XMail Filter @@MACROS

2004-05-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 28 May 2004 11:59 am, Liron Newman wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >Is anyone else interested it this scheme? Am I just being one of > >Davide's PITA people? Davide? Supporters? Detractors? Please let me know. > > > >I promise if I get voted down, I'll shut-up about it (I can hear Dav

[xmail] Re: XMail Filter @@MACROS

2004-05-28 Thread Liron Newman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Is anyone else interested it this scheme? Am I just being one of >Davide's PITA people? Davide? Supporters? Detractors? Please let me know. > >I promise if I get voted down, I'll shut-up about it (I can hear Davide >thinking: '...voted? Who said anything about xmail being

[xmail] Re: XMail Filter @@MACROS

2004-05-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 28 May 2004 11:30 am, Tracy wrote: > At 17:15 5/28/2004, you wrote: > >I think it would be neat to allow replacement anywhere in an argment, > >so you could write something like: > > > >"/some/path/myfilter.pl" "rcpt=@@RCPT&msg=@@FILE&from=@@FROM" > > > >and have the replacements done. Th

[xmail] Re: XMail Filter @@MACROS

2004-05-28 Thread Tracy
At 17:15 5/28/2004, you wrote: >I think it would be neat to allow replacement anywhere in an argment, >so you could write something like: > >"/some/path/myfilter.pl" "rcpt=@@RCPT&msg=@@FILE&from=@@FROM" > >and have the replacements done. Then, in this example, you could parse >a single argument lik

[xmail] XMail Filter @@MACROS

2004-05-28 Thread beau
Hi - I was wondering if there is any support in the xmail community for the following: I would like the way '@@macro' filter/auth/etc. arguments are parsed by xmail to be enhanced. Currently, for example, you may pass '@@macros' to filters as arguments by setting up the filter's .tab like: "/som

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 28 May 2004 09:58 am, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > On Friday 28 May 2004 08:57 am, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > > 1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the > > > file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format:

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Tracy
At 16:04 5/28/2004, you wrote: > > It was posted here, about where in the code the real recipients were being > > determined and where they were stored... > > > > In other words, I was going to locally modify pre06 to do what you > modified > > pre07 to do...:) > >/me think. Didn't I have already

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Tracy wrote: > At 15:59 5/28/2004, you wrote: > > > >1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the > > > >file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: > > > > > > > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} > > > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2} > > > >

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Tracy
At 15:59 5/28/2004, you wrote: > > >1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the > > >file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: > > > > > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} > > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2} > > > > > > > > >The REAL-ADDRESS is the equivalent of

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Tracy wrote: > At 14:57 5/28/2004, you wrote: > > > >1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the > >file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: > > > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2} > > > > > >The REAL-A

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > On Friday 28 May 2004 08:57 am, Davide Libenzi wrote: > > 1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the > > file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: > > > > RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} > > RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 28 May 2004 08:57 am, Davide Libenzi wrote: > 1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the > file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: > > RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} > RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2} > > > The REAL-ADDRESS is the equivalent of @@

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Tracy
At 14:57 5/28/2004, you wrote: >1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the >file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: > >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} >RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2} > > >The REAL-ADDRESS is the equivalent of @@RRCPT in macro substitution

[xmail] Re: [ANNOUNCE] bsa_filter 0.3-beta

2004-05-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
On Friday 28 May 2004 09:02 am, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > > > A little OT FYI: > > > > Having grown up on the east coast of the USA, I, like most 'mainland' > > North Americans, did not consider the pressed/processed meat produc

[xmail] Re: [ANNOUNCE] bsa_filter 0.3-beta

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Beau E. Cox wrote: > > A little OT FYI: > > Having grown up on the east coast of the USA, I, like most 'mainland' > North Americans, did not consider the pressed/processed meat product > 'Spam' real food. I seldom ate it. Now I have been living in

[xmail] [ANNOUNCE] bsa_filter 0.3-beta

2004-05-28 Thread Beau E. Cox
Hi all - Thanks to Harald, I fixed a minor boo-boo in bsa_filter.pl (SpamAssassin filter). From the change log: NAME Change Log - Change Log for bsa_filter.pl CHANGES 28 May 2004 - 0.3-beta Reformat 'HAM' as well as 'SPAM' after spam check Make the new lines RFC compatible (\r\

[xmail] SMTP filters ...

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
1.19-pre07 adds the requested feature of showing the real rcpts in the file supplied to filters. The RCPT lines will have the format: RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS1} RCPT TO: {REAL-ADDRESS2} The REAL-ADDRESS is the equivalent of @@RRCPT in macro substitution. And no, it is not possible to implem

[xmail] Resolving alias recipients

2004-05-28 Thread Tracy
I'm attempting to determine where, in the XMail code, alias recipients are resolved to real local recipients. I noticed that this appears to happen in SMTPCheckForwardPath, but I can't see anything there that is storing the resolved recipient - it's being used to check if the mailbox is full, a

[xmail] Re: Some ideas about pre-filter

2004-05-28 Thread Edinilson J. Santos
Yes, in general. Just to adapt some to win/32 Thank you Edinilson - ATINET-Professional Web Hosting Tel Voz: (0xx11) 4412-0876 http://www.atinet.com.br - Original Message - From: "Tracy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Ok, so leaks that I saw are likely related to a kill. Hardly=20 > gethostbyname() and select() can leak. Oke doke though, leave it > running=20 for a while. Ok, thx, i'll let it run the whole weekend :-) - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a messag

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > I mean, the log is constatly updated. Does valgrind dumps it > > continuosly=3D20 or you need to stop it to let it dump? >=20 > i do >=20 > valgrind options path-to-xmail xmail-options 2>/logfile & Ok, so leaks that I saw are likely re

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> I mean, the log is constatly updated. Does valgrind dumps it > continuosly=20 or you need to stop it to let it dump? i do valgrind options path-to-xmail xmail-options 2>/logfile & - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > Are you killing the server to get dumps, or it just dumps by itslef? >=20 > clean shutdown -> change valgrind opts -> start again is my procedure. I mean, the log is constatly updated. Does valgrind dumps it continuosly=20 or you need

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Are you killing the server to get dumps, or it just dumps by itslef? clean shutdown -> change valgrind opts -> start again is my procedure. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in t

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > Sonke, can you set --num-callers=3D3D8 and redo? >=20 > of course :-) done. Are you killing the server to get dumps, or it just dumps by itslef? - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the b

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Sonke, can you set --num-callers=3D8 and redo? of course :-) done. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: >=20 > > > Getting closer. Now remove the "strip" lines from Makefile.lnx and > > > rebuild=3D =3D20 > > > it (and replace the binary). > >=20 > > Ok done. >=20 > Good, let it run. Valgrind repla

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > Getting closer. Now remove the "strip" lines from Makefile.lnx and > > rebuild=3D =3D20 > > it (and replace the binary). >=20 > Ok done. Good, let it run. Valgrind replaces the pthread library with his own, and= =20 I supect that we wo

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Getting closer. Now remove the "strip" lines from Makefile.lnx and > rebuild= =20 > it (and replace the binary). Ok done. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a messa

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > Can you add --leak-check=3D3Dyes >=20 > done. Log is at the known location. >=20 > I updated to pre06, too. Getting closer. Now remove the "strip" lines from Makefile.lnx and rebuild= =20 it (and replace the binary). - Davide - To

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> Better sure it to be clean. You absolutely can't run two XMail's on > the=20 same mail root. Maybe you could add some check in 2.0 ? ;-) > Can you add --leak-check=3Dyes done. Log is at the known location. I updated to pre06, too. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe x

[xmail] Re: XMail PSYNC Configuration

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Aseem Dayal wrote: > Hi - I have configured my local domain accounts to be > synched with my external domain accounts. During > synchronization the mail is downloaded to the local > server & deleted from the external server. How can I > configure PSYNC to leave a copy of the m

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > I hope you're not saying you're running multiple copies of XMail on > > the=3D20 same $MAIL_ROOT, do you? >=20 > Maybe if a restart was unclean?! Better sure it to be clean. You absolutely can't run two XMail's on the=20 same mail root

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> I hope you're not saying you're running multiple copies of XMail on > the=20 same $MAIL_ROOT, do you? Maybe if a restart was unclean?! > Hmm, it's confusing since it dumps all exiting processes. Can you add > a=20 -v --num-callers=3D6 to the command line and stop it after > 10-25 minutes= =20

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 28 May 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > Hi Davide, >=20 > > File names inside the spool/local directory are hashed and the value > > is=3D20 "moduled" to the number of LMAIL threads. Each LMAIL thread has > > a unique=3D20 ID (0, ..., N) and it touches only file names whole > >

[xmail] XMail PSYNC Configuration

2004-05-28 Thread Aseem Dayal
Hi - I have configured my local domain accounts to be synched with my external domain accounts. During synchronization the mail is downloaded to the local server & deleted from the external server. How can I configure PSYNC to leave a copy of the mails behind on the external server & not delete the

[xmail] Re: LMAIL 3 times

2004-05-28 Thread Sönke Ruempler
Hi Davide, > File names inside the spool/local directory are hashed and the value > is=20 "moduled" to the number of LMAIL threads. Each LMAIL thread has > a unique=20 ID (0, ..., N) and it touches only file names whole > modules hash is equal= =20 > to its thread ID. What about more instances of