[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote: >On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote: > > > >>So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are >>redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it >>would never ever run, right? >> >>If so, what *can* I do to run a filter fo

[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote: > So if I have a domain, say redir.com, thatall addresses under it are > redirectors to somewhere else, and I set a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED], it > would never ever run, right? > > If so, what *can* I do to run a filter for [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it is a

[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Liron Newman
Davide Libenzi wrote: >>I have a filter that runs XAV, both in fiters.in and filters.out. >> >>The line in the filters.*.tab is: >>"*""*""0.0.0.0/0""0.0.0.0/0""av.tab" >>(Yes, real tabs, don't worry.) >> >>av.tab says: >>"c:\xav\xav.exe""c:\xav""@@FILE""@@FROM""@@RCP

[xmail] Re: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Toby Reiter wrote: > messages for SPAM (if only there was a way to prevent mail from being > scanned twice). Add an header in the message. - Davide - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For general

[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, Jan Rovner wrote: > Hello, > > is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster? > > During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20 > 1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors > etc.). This is a clear DNS problem. Can y

[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Fri, 4 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > You must have missed earlier messages of Davide then. You should > > upgrade your glibc library on that machine. >=20 > glibc-2.2.4-13 > glibc-common-2.2.4-13 > glibc-devel-2.2.4-13 > gcc-2.96-98 Remember to shut down the server clean

[xmail] Re: 1.20 out ...

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > Ran the mem debug version here for several day and no leaks were > > detected!=20 >=20 > Memchecker runs now on the main server. I'll let it run until RSS is 40MB= =2E Hmmm, did you setup valgrind or my memtracer?? - Davide - To uns

[xmail] Re: SMTP filters and RCPT TO

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote: > Davide Libenzi wrote: > is it possible to filter out RCPT TO lines in a SMTP filter (if there are > more then one lines) so that I can change the recipient list? > > > > >>>Yes. I need to check what happens if you leave th

[xmail] Re: Bug or misconfiguration?

2004-06-04 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Liron Newman wrote: > I have a filter that runs XAV, both in fiters.in and filters.out. > > The line in the filters.*.tab is: > "*""*""0.0.0.0/0""0.0.0.0/0""av.tab" > (Yes, real tabs, don't worry.) > > av.tab says: > "c:\xav\xav.exe""c:\xav""@@FILE"

[xmail] Re: AW: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Toby Reiter
>Please update to sa_filter2 or ba_filter. The original sa_filter misses = >some >mails when spamd is too busy. > >http://xmail.marketmix.com/downloads/sa_filter2.zip >http://xmail.beaucox.com/ Hmmm...how did i miss sa_filter2? I've been watching the list pretty closely -- I must have missed it b

[xmail] Re: Relayed Mail Not Triggering Filters?

2004-06-04 Thread Toby Reiter
>Toby Reiter pravi: >> All, >> I find that mail that gets relayed through my backup MX does not >> always get caught by SpamAssassin. Does anyone have a similar >> experience? Does anyone have any hints about why this might happen? >> I'm using the Drake's SA_Filter, which works absolutely bea

[xmail] Re: AW: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Rovner
Thank all for the support ! Increasing SMAIL thread count and decreasing=20 retries (probably :-)) solved the problem: -Qr 3 -Qn 100 Now, the xmail.exe process is taking some CPU :-) and queue=20 looks almost empty. Regads, Jan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Rob Arends
You might find that the udp/tcp on your SmartDNSHost is the problem. DNS queries are done via UDP DNS zone transfers are done via TCP You might find that because you are not defined as a valid secondary Name Server for any zones on your ISPs DNS server, you will be blocked on TCP/53. I recommend

[xmail] AW: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Harald Schneider
Tweak the resend cycle: -Qi ratio Set the increment ratio of the reschedule time in = sending a messages. At every failure in delivery a message, = reschedule time T is incremented by (T / ratio), therefore : T(i) =3D T(i-1)

[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Rovner
>This sounds like dns problems. There should be no DNS problems, there are no firewalls, server is=20 connected directly to the backbone.=20 "SmartDNSHost" "195.28.64.119:udp, 195.28.64.119:tcp" DNS server is provided by the ISP, I've tried to use my own Microsoft DNS server (127.0.0.1) but it

[xmail] Re: Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Sasa Stupar
Jan Rovner pravi: > Hello, > > is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster? > > During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20 > 1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors > etc.). > > It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a m

[xmail] Delayed deliveries - SLOW deliveries

2004-06-04 Thread Jan Rovner
Hello, is that any way how to force xmail (on windows) to deliver mails faster? During the day, xmail queue manager shows about=20 1500 sending messages + 1400 resending (because of mail address errors etc.). It takes *SO LONG* time after the xmail accepts a mail via SMTP (and puts it in the que