mluseradd
mluserdel
Roman
At 18:31 24.6.2004, you wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Roman Dusek wrote:
>
> > The link is http://customer.iclub.cz/mail.zip
> >
> > Mailing list users are edited via interface that calls ctrlclnt.exe. As
> > mailing list is working fine almost all the time it seems maili
I am using now /domain/mailproc.tab.
I need it to apply one filter to only one domain, instead to run it for
every email that arrive to the mail server.
It works great while not having /domain/user/mailproc.tab because with
it the /domain/mailproc.tab has no effect :(
I would be so happy if the
On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Roman Dusek wrote:
> The link is http://customer.iclub.cz/mail.zip
>
> Mailing list users are edited via interface that calls ctrlclnt.exe. As
> mailing list is working fine almost all the time it seems mailing list
> users files are O.K.
Which CTRL command do you use to u
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > 2. Can unknown user e-mails be downloaded to a mail box
> > instead of sending a delivery failure message.
>
> Ouch, there *is*, and it's the "Pop3SyncErrorAccount" variable in
> server.tab. But obviously has not been documented :)
> /me going to ad
At 10:22 6/24/2004, Thomas Berger wrote:
>Admittedly I didn't try it out, from my understanding of RFC 2821 the
>target MTA admin could correctly argue that my MTA should be cope with
>that situation: He still has another working MX (and his DNS is properly
>set up) and it is not his fault that my
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Thomas Berger wrote:
> Tracy wrote:
>
> |>XMAIL should drop servers which gave 5xx errors from further retries
> |>in transmission but should continue as long there are any servers
> |>left. This will be a bit inconvenient when (due to misconfiguration)
> |>some of the MX tim
At 10:22 6/24/2004, Thomas Berger wrote:
>When XMAIL encounters a 5xx response for a given piece of mail from a
>certain MX for the target domain, it should (of course?) not retry its
>delivery attempts to *this* server (and this pice of mail). However
>XMAIL should try delivery (of this piece of m
Tracy wrote:
|>XMAIL should drop servers which gave 5xx errors from further retries
|>in transmission but should continue as long there are any servers
|>left. This will be a bit inconvenient when (due to misconfiguration)
|>some of the MX time out permanently because XMAIL will try again and
|>ag
On Thu, 24 Jun 2004, Hamilton Thurgood wrote:
> Davide
> I have a number of questions
>
> 1. We have a domain mail box from which we download
> the companies e-mail and then distribute. Is there any
> reason why we cannot name our internal e-mail server
> the same name as our extern
At 03:46 6/24/2004, Thomas Berger wrote:
>XMAIL should drop servers which gave 5xx errors from further retries
>in transmission but should continue as long there are any servers
>left. This will be a bit inconvenient when (due to misconfiguration)
>some of the MX time out permanently because XMAIL
Davide
I have a number of questions
1. We have a domain mail box from which we download
the companies e-mail and then distribute. Is there any
reason why we cannot name our internal e-mail server
the same name as our external internet e-mail server
2. Can unknown user e-mails be
Hello Davide,
>>The target domain has 3 MX entries:
>>
>>20 buch.biblio.etc.tu-bs.de.
>>58 rzcomm5.rz.tu-bs.de.
>>10 mailscan.biblio.etc.tu-bs.de.
>>
>>MX 10 seems to be filtered by a firewall or a spam policy going
>>wild (responds to ping, connect to port 25 times out).
>>
>>MX 20 seems to be sh
12 matches
Mail list logo
