[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
Hmm... I really like the clamd option of clamav-win32. Seems really well suited for use on a mail server. ClamWin is definitely suited for average home use (nice interface, cool/simple install program, and plugs into Outlook). So I'll look at clamscan.exe first (they both share that) and then a

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Tony Wu
CalmAV for Windows http://www.sosdg.org/clamav-win32/ this one only provide command line tool. Probably a bit faster. ClamWin does provide GUI, and I feel it is more suitable at desktop. On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:13:04 -0600, Jason J. Ellingson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > CalmAV for Windows... >

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
CalmAV for Windows... http://www.clamwin.net/ Jason J Ellingson Technical Consultant 615.301.1682 : nashville 612.605.1132 : minneapolis www.ellingson.com [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EM

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
SpamAssassin with all tests enabled is the winner hands down. There are no others that compare. Most who say SA can be beat by product xxx did not try SA with everything enabled... they only had the offline tests enabled, or worse, messed with the defaults thinking they were smarter than the deve

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Manny Fulgencio
Jason, Thanks a lot for this info. How about for anti-spam. What commercial package would you recommend other than Spamassassin? Regards, Manny -Original Message- From: Jason J. Ellingson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [xmail] F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos Received: Friday, November 19, 2004

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Tim McGarvey
It's been a while since I looked, but there's a windows port for Clamav now? Last time I installed it I had to install Cygwin, locate a missing dependency file in the cygwin install of one of the math packages to get md5 checks working, and manually build the executable from source. After getting

[xmail] Re: Stunnel need help please

2004-11-19 Thread Yann LE ROCH - Agence CHROM
Re Hello I found a information on doc of xmail http://www.xmailserver.com/Readme.html#pop3_commands id need close the standard POP3 port for the rest of the world by binding it to 127.0.0.1. and use parameter -PI for that. BUT i 've 2 questions (before make a mistake) :-( - how to do that? by l

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Tracy
At 09:53 11/19/2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote: >I think that would work great for an end-point mail server. You could never >do that if you were hosting emails for others. I have users on >###-###.dsl.net addresses that have email accounts on my servers. They >wouldn't be able to send emails. T

[xmail] Stunnel need help please

2004-11-19 Thread Yann LE ROCH - Agence CHROM
Hello, i've follow the instruction about this post http://xmailforum.homelinux.net/index.php?showtopic=601 for install Stunnel I create my stunnel.pem whit OpenSSL without error, but when i try to connect outlook on port 995 , i have an error :0800ccc0e and i don't understand why, on log of Stunnel

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
Okay, ClamAV and AVG are added to the "to do" list. I'll even see about getting them in over the weekend (after releasing V1.3). I will assume we are looking at the AVG free personal use version? Jason J Ellingson Technical Consultant

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
I think that would work great for an end-point mail server. You could never do that if you were hosting emails for others. I have users on ###-###.dsl.net addresses that have email accounts on my servers. They wouldn't be able to send emails. Again... good idea for personal email server, but no

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread K. Wolf
Or AVG for that matter. ;-) Wolfy At 01:31 AM 20/11/2004, you wrote: >May you add the Clamav support? >They have a good port for windows that works greta and it is FREE. > >Thanks > >Rosario > > >- Original Message - >From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Tracy
At 09:20 11/19/2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote: >For those using my XMail AV filter for Win32, I thought I'd give you an >update on AV testing... > >I've been testing F-Prot, McAfee, and Sophos for a couple weeks now and >after several thousands of emails we have a definite winner... > >F-Prot is by

[xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Ing. Rosario Pingaro
May you add the Clamav support? They have a good port for windows that works greta and it is FREE. Thanks Rosario - Original Message - From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:20 AM Subject: [xmail] F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

[xmail] F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos

2004-11-19 Thread Jason J. Ellingson
For those using my XMail AV filter for Win32, I thought I'd give you an update on AV testing... I've been testing F-Prot, McAfee, and Sophos for a couple weeks now and after several thousands of emails we have a definite winner... F-Prot is by far the fastest. It scans emails in 200-300ms. It h

[xmail] Re: SMTP External Authentication

2004-11-19 Thread Dustin C. Hatch
I have one quick question, and then I think I have got it. When is the useredit called from $XMAIL_ROOT/userauth/pop3/domain.tab? What I am planning is to write a script that takes the place of the passwd program that calls CtrlClnt to change the password in xmail, which calls said file and a