[xmail] Xmail + Imap (Non-Courier) Setup

2005-01-15 Thread Chris L. Franklin
I finally got around to writing up a How-to. On how-to set Xmail + Dovecot. (which will handle both Imap + Pop3) I know Xmail handles Pop3. But I've found I have less issues with users who use a combo of Pop3 + imap. If the Service that handles pop3 also handles imap. This setup is IMHO alot eas

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Eric Garnice
Yeah, yeah, my butt is stinging. :) That's what happens when you're forced to work on silly products like Exchange that require 1.5GB of RAM for 12 users (large message store), and it really starts puking once you hit the swapfile. It tends to make the rest of your brains go mush. Thanks fo

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Eric Garnice wrote: > Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you mentio= > ned a=20 > single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude MailRoot from= > =20 > the memory-resident virus scanner. I excluded MailRoot and all mail=20 > instan

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Mike Harrington
XMail - no filters on that server. - Original Message - From: "Davide Libenzi" To: Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2005 3:52 PM Subject: [xmail] Re: A question of delivery > On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote: > > > I had a smiliar scenario in 1.20 with a message once that was sit

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Eric Garnice
On Saturday 15 January 2005 5:18 pm, S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > I hope that Eric can extract it ;) > - Well, thank you S=F6nke for putting me on the right track. When you mentio= ned a=20 single devil message, it reminded me that I failed to exclude MailRoot from= =20 the memory-resident virus s

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, Mike Harrington wrote: > I had a smiliar scenario in 1.20 with a message once that was sitting in the > queue, sent the CPU usage to 100% and stopped all mail delivery until i > cleared out the spool. I may actually still have it sitting around here > somewhere if you want it

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Mike Harrington
I had a smiliar scenario in 1.20 with a message once that was sitting in the queue, sent the CPU usage to 100% and stopped all mail delivery until i cleared out the spool. I may actually still have it sitting around here somewhere if you want it. -Mike - Original Message - From: "Davide

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Sönke Ruempler
On Saturday, January 15, 2005 10:23 PM [GMT+1=CET], Davide Libenzi wrote: > You did not send me the message, so if it was a problem with XMail, > the=20 problem is likely to be still there. Yes, I deleted the mail in the rush :[ I hope that Eric can extract it ;) - To unsubscribe from this list

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Eric Garnice
I will have some time to check it out in about 5 hours from now. Sönke Ruempler said the following on 01/15/2005 03:51 PM: > Hopefully Eric >gets the message and we can hunt the bug ;-) > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTEC

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > > If this is true, it is extremely important that I get that message. I > > find=3D =3D20 > > also very unlikely that XMail does not deliver other messages, since > > there=3D =3D20 > > are many SMAIL threads on the system. So you should

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Sönke Ruempler
> If this is true, it is extremely important that I get that message. I > find= =20 > also very unlikely that XMail does not deliver other messages, since > there= =20 > are many SMAIL threads on the system. So you should have so many > "strange"= =20 > messages as the number of SMAIL threads. Dav

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Sat, 15 Jan 2005, [iso-8859-1] S=F6nke Ruempler wrote: > On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=3DCET], > Eric Garnice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >=20 > > One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished > > committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear alon

[xmail] Re: A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Sönke Ruempler
On Saturday, January 15, 2005 2:53 PM [GMT+1=CET], Eric Garnice <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished > committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear along, I > installed XMail on a file server in that office and routed all > o

[xmail] A question of delivery

2005-01-15 Thread Eric Garnice
One of our offices has an Exchange server that's almost finished committing suicide (what else is new). To help the old bear along, I installed XMail on a file server in that office and routed all outbound mail from Exchange through XMail thereby keeping the Exchange outbound queues clean of s