Hello Davide, hello list,
I think a flag for (SMTP)-filters which disables filter execution for
whilelisted Ips (listed in smtp.ipprop.tab with Whitelist=1) would be very
helpful (similar to aex).
Something like:
!ipprop(Whitelist=1)[TAB]command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
This would be
On 04.08.2005 18:06, Manuel Martin wrote:
Hello Davide, hello list,
I think a flag for (SMTP)-filters which disables filter execution for
whilelisted Ips (listed in smtp.ipprop.tab with Whitelist=1) would be very
helpful (similar to aex).
Something like:
On 02.08.2005 16:46, Kevin Williams wrote:
I must be missing something here, but I don't see it. I have a mailing
list, and one member says they can't send to the list. XMail bounced the
message with this reason:
553 5.7.1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender address rejected: not logged in
As
At 18.06 04/08/05 +0200, you wrote:
I think a flag for (SMTP)-filters which disables filter execution for
whilelisted Ips (listed in smtp.ipprop.tab with Whitelist=3D1) would =
be very
helpful (similar to aex).
Something like:
!ipprop(Whitelist=3D1)[TAB]command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE=
Manuel Martin wrote:
I think a flag for (SMTP)-filters which disables filter execution for
whilelisted Ips (listed in smtp.ipprop.tab with Whitelist=1) would
be very helpful (similar to aex).
Something like:
!ipprop(Whitelist=1)[TAB]command[TAB]arg-or-macro[TAB]...[NEWLINE]
This would be
Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV?
With just telling ClamAV to scan the message file supplied by Xmail,
It'll miss a number of the test from http://www.webmail.us/testvirus
If I build a new temp file to scan doing the following:
- Strip MAIL-DATA and everything before
- Add a
Hi John -
I use clamSMTP - it is c based proxy that is very lightweight and easy
to use. I also use ASSP in front of this for anti-spam (so sender -
ASSP - clamSMTP - XMail - sendee). As it turns out, after testing,
the emails didn't even reach my anti-virus because ASSP blocked all of
the
Oops! I forgot to post back to the list. Sorry.
Yes, it is the error from the other person's server. They have it set to
reject messages where the MAIL_FROM resolves to a local account but no
SMTP AUTH is given. I suspect this configuration will cause grief to
lots of Postfix users who
Are you using my Python filter or writing your own? I tested with file
attachments, and it caught them quite well, but that was all I had to
test with. Improvements are welcome.
John Kielkopf wrote:
Anyone else scanning mail with ClamAV?
With just telling ClamAV to scan the message file
I'm using my own script, currently running from filters.post-data.tab
(this may change).
It'll catch many attachments without the changes to the message, just
not all of them.
--John
Kevin Williams wrote:
Are you using my Python filter or writing your own? I tested with file
attachments,
Jeff Buehler wrote:
Hi John -
I use clamSMTP - it is c based proxy that is very lightweight and easy
to use. I also use ASSP in front of this for anti-spam (so sender -
ASSP - clamSMTP - XMail - sendee). As it turns out, after testing,
the emails didn't even reach my anti-virus because
I simply disallow email of greater than 5 mb (that was my cutoff
exactly!) - email is not ideal for large file transfers for a number of
reasons, so I discourage it.
However, if you need to allow larger emails, then I'm not certain how
different your situation is - ASSP does a significant
Jeff Buehler wrote:
I simply disallow email of greater than 5 mb (that was my cutoff
exactly!) - email is not ideal for large file transfers for a number of
reasons, so I discourage it.
I agree, however some of my users may say otherwise ;)
I was thinking about scanning all messages 2MB
As far as I know, it does. ASSP greylisting is a bit of a mystery to
me, though, to be honest, so this aspect you should research. I don't
think it is using greylisting in the same way as XMail does but I am not
really certain (there is some sort of a greylist download that occurs
and is
14 matches
Mail list logo
