You're the best!
It works perfeclty now. Even the stuck mails from the previous build are
delivered instantly.
Can you tell which problem caused this behavious? Something thread related ?
Thanks again,
Harald
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>> Oh, yes. It is
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>> Oh, yes. It is send you these emails, as you can see from the headers
>> :-) One other thing, I've been watching the logs as I ran it and it
>> seems to be a bit more responsive in sending out SMTP email. Be
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote:
> Oh, yes. It is send you these emails, as you can see from the headers
> :-) One other thing, I've been watching the logs as I ran it and it
> seems to be a bit more responsive in sending out SMTP email. Before it
> would sit for a bit, a minute or two, be
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote:
>
>>Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>
>>>I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs
>>>versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the
>>>following version:
>>
>>No problems so far, on OpenB
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>
>
>>>When doing a rpm upgrade I now get this error, any reason ?
>>>
>>>error: Failed dependencies:
>>> linux-gate.so.1 is needed by xmail-1.22-1.i386
>>>
>>>
>>>Ps. I did NOT get this with prior versions.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>> When doing a rpm upgrade I now get this error, any reason ?
>>
>> error: Failed dependencies:
>>linux-gate.so.1 is needed by xmail-1.22-1.i386
>>
>>
>> Ps. I did NOT get this with prior versions.
>
> I think RPM-build scripts on Debian fail
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Rene Rivera wrote:
>
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>> I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs
>> versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the
>> following version:
>
> No problems so far, on OpenBSD 3.7. But mine is a very
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Chris L. Franklin wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>> There is a possible buffer overflow vulnerability in all versions of XMail
>> previous to 1.22. This does not affect the server itself, but the XMail's
>> sendmail binary. Since many runs the XMail's sendmail as suid root,
Davide Libenzi wrote:
> I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs
> versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the
> following version:
No problems so far, on OpenBSD 3.7. But mine is a very low traffic
server so I only tend to see the get
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>There is a possible buffer overflow vulnerability in all versions of XMail
>previous to 1.22. This does not affect the server itself, but the XMail's
>sendmail binary. Since many runs the XMail's sendmail as suid root, the
>issue can be critical, even if not easily explo
I might have found the reason for the XMail erratic behaviour on some BSDs
versions. I need Solaris and *BSD users to try to build and run the
following version:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.23-pre01.tar.gz
Thank you!
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscr
On Thu, 13 Oct 2005, Liron Newman wrote:
> Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> There is a possible buffer overflow vulnerability in all versions of XMail
>>> previous to 1.22. This does not affect the server itself, but the XMail's
>>> sendmail binar
Davide Libenzi wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
>
>
>>There is a possible buffer overflow vulnerability in all versions of XMail
>>previous to 1.22. This does not affect the server itself, but the XMail's
>>sendmail binary. Since many runs the XMail's sendmail as suid root,
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> There is a possible buffer overflow vulnerability in all versions of XMail
> previous to 1.22. This does not affect the server itself, but the XMail's
> sendmail binary. Since many runs the XMail's sendmail as suid root, the
> issue can be critical, ev
There is a possible buffer overflow vulnerability in all versions of XMail
previous to 1.22. This does not affect the server itself, but the XMail's
sendmail binary. Since many runs the XMail's sendmail as suid root, the
issue can be critical, even if not easily exploitable w/out knowing the
On Wed, 12 Oct 2005, Chad Fleenor wrote:
> We have had a problem when we tried to send an email to 15 or so users. One
> of the users mail box was full, but the email to the list didn't go to
> anyone on the list. Here is the error message:
>
>
>
> The message could not be sent because one of t
On Tue, 11 Oct 2005, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
> Hello Davide
>
> xmail 1.22-pre01 seems resolv in most cases the 'A ptr' use problem then mx
> entries availables.
>
> I say 'in most cases' because after first attempt with my current setup, I
> needed to stop use the '"SmartDNSHost"' setting in my s
We have had a problem when we tried to send an email to 15 or so users. One
of the users mail box was full, but the email to the list didn't go to
anyone on the list. Here is the error message:
The message could not be sent because one of the recipients was rejected by
the server. The rejecte
It needs to be in filters.post-data.tab not filtert.post-data.tab
make sure the file is at least chmod'ed to 111
aka : chmod 111 antivirus.sh
Make sure you restart the email server after installing the filter
Make sure you have service clamd running.
-- Chris L. Franklin --
- Original M
19 matches
Mail list logo
