At 21.55 16/02/06, you wrote:
>If I send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- with a trailing '.'
>After the .com, I get a mail loop error back.
I suppose "domain.com" is a local domain. This is a known issue (see
the thread on "local domain and trailing dot"). Queued for next
release. By now the
Davide, any ETA on a fix?
Thanks.
-Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Francesco Vertova
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 2:55 AM
To: xmail@xmailserver.org
Subject: [xmail] Re: mail loop?
At 21.55 16/02/06, you wrote:
>If I send a mes
Hello Davide and list
I don't know if i reported this problem before so excuse me if allready
done.
On my xmail 1.22 (w2k sp4 win32 platform) I noticed the following symptom :
When a mail is send to an external 'TO' address (not handled by xmail) and
the 'TO' address is syntaxicaly bad in the d
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, CLEMENT Francis wrote:
>
> Hello Davide and list
>
> I don't know if i reported this problem before so excuse me if allready
> done.
>
> On my xmail 1.22 (w2k sp4 win32 platform) I noticed the following symptom :
>
> When a mail is send to an external 'TO' address (not handle
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, Don Drake wrote:
> Davide, any ETA on a fix?
Dunno yet.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe xmail" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi all...
First of, a huge wave to David L. for a great piece of software...
Secondly a big wave to the rest on this list...
(For the record, I'm in sunny (Currently) Johannesburg, South
Africa... [We have been tormented with torrential rains in the last
month or so...])
I am new to this list,
Hi,
I also have the same problem here, with many clients that somehow got
into their fu Outlook addresses with single quotes for example
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
I have checked and Thunderbird also fails to notify of bad address
format, so M$ is not the only one to blaim.
Maybe checking this wou
I have found a situation with XMail where XMail ignores the mailbox quotas.
If there are two mailboxes on the same box and one forwards into the other,
XMail ignores the mailbox quota of the second mailbox when receiving
forwards from the first one.
For example, lets say we have two mailboxes cal
And would you have the bounce say:
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailbox full
Or
550 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mailbox full
My thinking is that it should be [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the original rcpt to),
but I can see why you might do otherwise.
Does this occur between two users on the same domain? Ie. Is it a prob
Hi everyone,
That email from Shiloh Jennings today, made me think about some of the
issues we've seen over time that relate to quota checks and what method the
email arrived -> smtp or psync or redirect, etc.
There are a number of places in Xmail where rules seem to be inconsistent.
Actually
I am testing Davide's greylist module (as usual - very nice), but have one
question. It seems that the sender always receives 1 bounce message when
greylisting is activated.
I would really like the process transparent to the end user - for the sender
to not receive any notice. I thought that
The problem occurs when the email forwards from one account to another on
the same box. It can be the same domain, but it does not have to be.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob Arends
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2006 5:36 PM
To: xmail@xm
12 matches
Mail list logo
