Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k

2009-09-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > > > Here is it : > > Debug with ctrlclnt v 1.26pre05, Call Stack (with source and source args > > options activated) : > > > > ntdll!RtlpWaitForCriticalSection+0x8a > > ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0x46 >

Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k

2009-09-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Here is it : > Debug with ctrlclnt v 1.26pre05, Call Stack (with source and source args > options activated) : > > ntdll!RtlpWaitForCriticalSection+0x8a > ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0x46 > CtrlClnt!SysCreateTlsKey(int * TlsKey = 0x0047a3cc, * pFre

Re: [xmail] Mail loop detected error

2009-09-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Chen Shihai wrote: > I've been using XMail 1.22 on Windows 2003 Server for several years. But > recent > days, after I updated it to 1.25 on RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.3, many mail > loops > sent from outside have been detected. Just as the following: Did you change the MaxM

[xmail] Mail loop detected error

2009-09-30 Thread Chen Shihai
I've been using XMail 1.22 on Windows 2003 Server for several years. But recent days, after I updated it to 1.25 on RedHat Enterprise Linux 5.3, many mail loops sent from outside have been detected. Just as the following: [<00>] XMail bounce: rcpt=[...@test.com];Error=[Mail loop detected] [<01

Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k

2009-09-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, CLEMENT Francis wrote: > Here is it : > Debug with ctrlclnt v 1.26pre05, Call Stack (with source and source args > options activated) : > > ntdll!RtlpWaitForCriticalSection+0x8a > ntdll!RtlEnterCriticalSection+0x46 > CtrlClnt!SysCreateTlsKey(int * TlsKey = 0x0047a3cc, * pFre

Re: [xmail] SBS 2008 pop3connector

2009-09-30 Thread Davide Libenzi
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009, Edinilson - ATINET wrote: > Is someone else having problem with this odd thing called SBS 2008 > pop3connector? > Many clients that use this connector are telling us that, for some reason, > it is considering XMail´s headers as invalid. No idea. It'd be great to know what a

[xmail] SBS 2008 pop3connector

2009-09-30 Thread Edinilson - ATINET
Is someone else having problem with this odd thing called SBS 2008 pop3connector? Many clients that use this connector are telling us that, for some reason, it is considering XMail´s headers as invalid. Some information from Microsoft´s site: Email Rejected Due to Protocol Errors (Invalid Header

Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k

2009-09-30 Thread CLEMENT Francis
>-Message d'origine- >De : xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org >[mailto:xmail-boun...@xmailserver.org]de la part de Davide Libenzi >Envoyé : mardi 29 septembre 2009 19:32 >À : XMail Users Mailing List >Objet : Re: [xmail] CtrlClnt local/remote diff in return value on w2k > > >On Tue, 29 Sep 2009,