On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question?
> > >
> > > I
On Thu, 24 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > That sounds pretty good, however, how about my fastcgi question?
>
> I told you the basic architecture, what do you want to know more ?
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For general help: send the line "help" in the body of a message to
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I am aware of the point on the virus scanning and I was planning o
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 22 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > > On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > O
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >
> > > > Thanks very much Davide, and yes, I agree but when I looked into it I
> > > >
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone has found an elegant way to run a "fastcgi" type
> > of filter with xmail under Windows where the executable that is spawned is
> > a very fast binary that
Dear all,
Just wondering if anyone has found an elegant way to run a "fastcgi" type
of filter with xmail under Windows where the executable that is spawned is
a very fast binary that then communicates with a persistent perl
interpreter or script, for instance.
There is some data about doing this
size and complexity of the
binary, there is a substantial cost in launching it.
I know some of the web server solutions are using some type of API to then
launch a request. For instance, the web server has an API for which a
plugin could be written to then send requests in a FastCGI type idea.
I'm not sure how simple it would be to implement though for you. Maybe one
of the existing available server modules for fastcgi could be used with
some modifications, but I think that there would not be too much benefit
to using fastcgi if there was no way to interface to it without launching
a separate process each time.
-Ree
