On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one in a long time.
NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH
SysDepUnix.cpp: In function 'int SysStackAlloc(ThreadStack**, int)';
SysDepUnix.cpp:1121: error:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one in a long time.
NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH
SysDepUnix.cpp: In function 'int SysStackAlloc(ThreadStack**,
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one in a long time.
NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH
On 9 Apr 2007, at 9:15, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one in a long time.
NetBSD 3.1.0_PATCH
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 9:15, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
http://www.xmailserver.org/xmail-1.25-pre03.tar.gz
First failure to build one
On 9 Apr 2007, at 16:09, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 9:15, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
On 9 Apr 2007, at 1:04, Davide Libenzi wrote:
Here it is:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
Could you give a spin to pre04?
No errors and now installed.
Abuse.net relaytest checked ok.
Thanks for testing!
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe xmail in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For general
On 9 Apr 2007, at 17:13, Davide Libenzi wrote:
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
Could you give a spin to pre04?
No errors and now installed.
Abuse.net relaytest checked ok.
Thanks for testing!
Your welcome
Oh and no longer get the ENODNS when connecting to my server as
On Tue, 10 Apr 2007, David Lord wrote:
Oh and no longer get the ENODNS when connecting to my server as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and CheckMailerDomain=1, although I don't
normally have that setting enabled.
Yeah, I tested that too. The new DNS code seems to get around those wierd
DNS
