On 12 Jun 2006, at 17:21, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Lord wrote:
>
> > This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages
> > rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of
> > lsof from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gm
On Thu, 8 Jun 2006, David Lord wrote:
> This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages
> rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of lsof
> from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake binary
> which hadn't changed from before I thought I'd u
On 3 Jun 2006, at 9:35, David Lord wrote:
This now looks as though I've been picking up NetBSD 2 packages
rather than NetBSD 3. I noticed a while back that new install of lsof
from a package was complaining it was 2.0 so checked on gmake binary
which hadn't changed from before I thought I'd u
On 1 Jun 2006, at 17:49, Davide Libenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 May 2006, David Lord wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure of exact cause but I'm getting fairly regular coredumps
> > from XMail on NetBSD-3.0. Whist the fd-open files issue on my
> > FreeBSD setup isn't apparent it is still an annoyance and if
On Wed, 31 May 2006, David Lord wrote:
> I'm not sure of exact cause but I'm getting fairly regular coredumps
> from XMail on NetBSD-3.0. Whist the fd-open files issue on my FreeBSD
> setup isn't apparent it is still an annoyance and if anything was a
> little more frequent, 2 - 3 days vs 2 - 3 w
