Hmm...
I really like the clamd option of clamav-win32. Seems really well suited
for use on a mail server.
ClamWin is definitely suited for average home use (nice interface,
cool/simple install program, and plugs into Outlook).
So I'll look at clamscan.exe first (they both share that) and then a
--Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tim McGarvey
> Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
>
> It's been a while since I looked, but there's a
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Tim McGarvey
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
It's been a while since I looked, but there's a windows port for Clamav now?
Last time I installed it I had to install Cygwin, locate
301.1682 : nashville
612.605.1132 : minneapolis
www.ellingson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Manny Fulgencio
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
Jason,
T
Jason,
Thanks a lot for this info. How about for anti-spam. What commercial package
would you recommend other than Spamassassin?
Regards,
Manny
-Original Message-
From: Jason J. Ellingson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
Received: Friday, November 19, 2004
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
May you add the Clamav support?
They have a good port for windows that works greta and it is FREE.
Thanks
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Se
At 09:53 11/19/2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
>I think that would work great for an end-point mail server. You could never
>do that if you were hosting emails for others. I have users on
>###-###.dsl.net addresses that have email accounts on my servers. They
>wouldn't be able to send emails.
T
ical Consultant
615.301.1682 : nashville
612.605.1132 : minneapolis
www.ellingson.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of K. Wolf
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NA
Tracy
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 8:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [xmail] Re: F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
I currently use F-Prot as by "backup" virus scanner. It's probably caught,
oh, somewhere around 10 virus emails this month (all that made it through
my primary scanner).
Or AVG for that matter. ;-)
Wolfy
At 01:31 AM 20/11/2004, you wrote:
>May you add the Clamav support?
>They have a good port for windows that works greta and it is FREE.
>
>Thanks
>
>Rosario
>
>
>- Original Message -
>From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
At 09:20 11/19/2004, Jason J. Ellingson wrote:
>For those using my XMail AV filter for Win32, I thought I'd give you an
>update on AV testing...
>
>I've been testing F-Prot, McAfee, and Sophos for a couple weeks now and
>after several thousands of emails we have a definite winner...
>
>F-Prot is by
May you add the Clamav support?
They have a good port for windows that works greta and it is FREE.
Thanks
Rosario
- Original Message -
From: "Jason J. Ellingson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 9:20 AM
Subject: [xmail] F-Prot vs NAI vs Sophos
12 matches
Mail list logo
